Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Acute Myocardial Infarction in Rats
Published on: February 16, 2011
[Effect of Myocardial Reperfusion on Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction]
I S Komarova1, L B Karova1, N V Andreeva1
1Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).
Background:
During the restoration of blood flow in the ischemic area of the myocardium, viable cardiomyocytes are damaged over a few minutes of tissue reperfusion (reperfusion myocardial damage). It is known that ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) develops in 11-19 % of patients who have undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in symptomatic coronary heart disease (CHD). To present day, the influence of myocardial reperfusion on IMR in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not fully understood.
Objective:
To study dynamics of quantitative indicators of IMR in patients with AMI after myocardial reperfusion.
Materials And Methods:
We included in this study 68 patients with AMI and IMR aged 36-79 years, who were hospitalized in cardiac intensive care unit of the Moscow S. S. Yudin hospital in 2016. All patients before and on the 7th day after PCI underwent doppler echocardiography study with calculation of quantitative parameters of IMR and index of local contractility (ILC) of the left ventricle (LV).
Results:
Three groups of patients were identified based on the analysis of the dynamics of quantitative parameters of IMR after myocardial reperfusion: group 1 - patients who had a decrease in IMR (n=23, 33.8 %), group 2 - patients with increase of IMR (n=28, 41.1 %), group 3 - patients with unchanged IMR (n=17, 25.1 %). The study of systolicLV function in all patients before PCI revealed moderately decreased ejection fraction (EF) (mean 49.05±1.19 %). On day 7 after myocardial reperfusion in group 2 we detected significant increases of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and the volume of the left atrium (LA), while in groups 1 and 3 these indexes remained unchanged. LV ILC did not differ between three groups, both at admission and on day 7 after reperfusion (p>0.05). There was no correlation between severity of IMR and ILC (correlation coefficient 0.24).
Conclusion:
Dynamics of quantitative parameters of IMR in 7 days after myocardial reperfusion in patients with AMI without endogenous and drug protection of the myocardium from reperfusion injury was multidirectional. IMR decreased in 33.8, increased in 41.1 and did not change in 25.1 % of patients. Systolic function and LV ILC underwent no significant dynamics.
Insights
Reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) causes varied changes in ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). While some patients show decreased IMR, many experience an increase, with no significant changes in systolic function or left ventricular contractility.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Reperfusion myocardial damage occurs after restoring blood flow in ischemic areas.
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) affects 11-19% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary heart disease (CHD).
- The impact of myocardial reperfusion on IMR in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the changes in quantitative indicators of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following myocardial reperfusion.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-eight patients with AMI and IMR (aged 36-79) were studied.
- Doppler echocardiography was performed before and 7 days after PCI to assess IMR parameters and left ventricular (LV) local contractility index (ILC).
Main Results:
- Three patient groups emerged: decreased IMR (33.8%), increased IMR (41.1%), and unchanged IMR (25.1%).
- Patients with increased IMR showed significant increases in LV end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and left atrial volume.
- No significant changes in LV systolic function or ILC were observed across groups, with no correlation between IMR severity and ILC.
Conclusions:
- Myocardial reperfusion in AMI patients leads to diverse IMR dynamics without endogenous or drug protection.
- A significant portion of patients experienced increased IMR post-reperfusion.
- Systolic function and LV ILC remained stable, indicating IMR changes are not directly linked to overall contractility in this cohort.
More Related Videos
12:03Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction