Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

07:15
Author Spotlight: Understanding Adolescent Social Adversity Effects on Neurodevelopment in Mice
Published on: March 15, 2024
2.5K
Temporal dynamic modulation of acute stress on error processing in healthy males
Na Hu1, Xueping Hu1, Zhenzhen Xu1
1Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Psychophysiology
|May 28, 2019
Summary
Acute stress impairs error detection, particularly in high cortisol responders, by reducing the error-related negativity (ERN) brain signal. This suggests stress impacts how we process mistakes.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Human Behavior
Background:
- Error processing is vital for adaptive behaviors.
- Acute stress is known to affect cognitive functions, including error processing.
- The specific neural mechanisms linking stress and error processing are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural dynamic correlates of acute stress modulation on error processing.
- To examine how acute stress influences behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) responses during error detection.
Main Methods:
- 39 healthy males underwent a two-session task (before and after stress test) with behavioral and EEG recording.
- Participants were randomly assigned to a stress condition (Maastricht Acute Stress Test) or a control condition.
- A color-word Stroop task was employed, and participants were classified as low or high cortisol responders.
Main Results:
- High cortisol responders showed reduced error-related negativity (ERN) amplitude after acute stress.
- The change in ERN (∆ERN) was significantly smaller in high cortisol responders compared to low responders.
- Error positivity amplitudes increased in the stress group, suggesting heightened error assessment.
Conclusions:
- Acute stress impairs error detection, with effects modulated by individual cortisol response levels.
- Stress leads to reduced neural sensitivity to errors (ERN) but increased conscious evaluation of errors (error positivity).
- These findings highlight the complex interplay between stress, neural error processing, and emotional/motivational responses to errors.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error
9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error
7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Infertility in Males
542
Male infertility affects millions of couples worldwide, arising from various factors that impact different stages of the reproductive process. An endocrine imbalance resulting from conditions like hypogonadism, Klinefelter syndrome, or pituitary disorders can disrupt hormone levels and reduce sperm production. Testicular defects, such as tumors, cryptorchidism, atrophic testes, abnormal sperm morphology, and low sperm count or motility, may arise due to genetic factors, structural...
542
Contaminants and Errors
352
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
352

