Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Electrolytic Inferior Vena Cava Model EIM of Venous Thrombosis
Published on: July 12, 2011
Doppler Recognition of Low or Normal Central Venous Pressure from Continuous Flow from Inferior Vena Cava Into Right
Rupesh Ranjan1, Hesam Mostafavi Toroghi2, Gregg S Pressman2
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Insights
Continuous inferior vena cava (IVC) Doppler flow on echocardiography reliably estimates central venous pressure (CVP). An uninterrupted IVC flow signal predicts normal CVP, while interrupted flow indicates elevated pressure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Estimating right atrial (RA) or central venous pressure (CVP) is crucial in echocardiography.
- Inferior vena cava (IVC) continuous inflow into the RA may serve as a surrogate for low/normal CVP.
- Standard echocardiographic views can potentially image IVC inflow.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that continuous IVC inflow into the RA is a reliable surrogate for low/normal CVP.
- To determine if IVC inflow can be reliably imaged in standard echocardiographic views.
- To compare CVP measured by right heart catheterization (RHC) with IVC Doppler wave (DW) patterns.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent both TTE and RHC within 8 hours.
- Selected patients with incidental interrogation of IVC inflow into RA using continuous wave Doppler during tricuspid valve evaluation.
- Compared CVP from RHC with continuous (uninterrupted) vs. interrupted DW inflow signals.
Main Results:
- 12 patients (20%) had continuous DW inflow, and 48 (80%) had interrupted flow.
- Continuous flow was associated with RA pressure ≤7 mm Hg (11/12 patients), while interrupted flow was associated with RA pressure >7 mm Hg (45/48 patients) (p=0.0001).
- Continuous DW signal predicted RA pressure ≤7 mm Hg with 98% sensitivity and 78% specificity, enhanced to 94% sensitivity and 92% specificity when combined with IVC size and collapsibility.
Conclusions:
- IVC flow pattern, assessed via Doppler, is a reliable method for estimating CVP in standard echocardiographic views.
- Continuous IVC flow predicts normal RA pressure, whereas interrupted flow predicts elevated RA pressure.
- Combining IVC flow pattern with IVC size and collapsibility improves accuracy in predicting normal RA pressure.
Abstract:
Estimation of right atrial (RA) or central venous pressure (CVP) is a critical component of a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) examination. We hypothesize that continuous inflow from the inferior vena cava (IVC) into the RA is a surrogate for low/normal CVP and can be reliably imaged in standard echocardiographic parasternal short and right ventricular inflow views. We retrospectively studied 200 patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) within 8 hours of TTE between 2012 and 2016, and selected 60 patients in whom the continuous wave Doppler beam incidentally interrogated IVC inflow into RA during evaluation of the tricuspid valve. From these studies, we sought an uninterrupted Doppler wave (DW) inflow signal. CVP on RHC were then compared in patients with continuous and interrupted DW. Other TTE and RHC parameters were also noted and compared in these 2 groups. The average time interval between TTE and RHC was 266 ± 151 minutes. Of 60 patients (males = 39 (65%); age 63 ± 14 years), 12 patients (20%) had continuous DW and 48 (80%) had interrupted DW inflow signal from IVC into the RA. Of the 12 patients with continuous flow, 11 had RA pressure of ≤7 mm Hg. Similarly, of 48 patients with interrupted flow, RA pressure was >7 mm Hg in 45, and less than ≤7 mm Hg in 3 patients (two-sided p value 0.0001). The continuous DW signal predicted RA of ≤7 mm Hg with a sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 78%, respectively. Additionally, when combined with IVC size and collapsibility (normal-sized collapsible IVC), the sensitivity and specificity of DW signal to predict RA of ≤ 7 mmHg were enhanced to 94% and 92%, respectively. In conclusion, IVC flow pattern can be reliably studied to estimate CVP in standard echocardiographic views. Continuous and interrupted IVC flow predicts normal and elevated RA pressure, respectively.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline
The pressure difference depends on the fluid's velocity and radius of curvature. The pressure variation is minimal in flows with nearly straight streamlines. However, the...
Anatomy of the Circulatory System
Doppler Effect - I
Doppler Effect - II
Measures of Central Tendency

