Crack-healing during two-stage crystallization of biomedical lithium (di)silicate glass-ceramics
Renan Belli1, Ulrich Lohbauer1, Friedlinde Goetz-Neunhoeffer2
1Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Zahnklinik 1 - Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie, Forschungslabor für dentale Biomaterialien, Glueckstrasse 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Objective:
The study is aimed to evaluate the two single commercially available two-step lithium-(di)silicate systems by analyzing their parent glass composition and studying the quantitative crystalline and glass phase evolution during the second stage heat-treatment. The mechanical repercussions of the crystallization firing were evaluated using strength and fracture toughness tests.
Methods:
XRF and ICP-OES were used to determine the oxide composition of the parent glasses in Suprinity PC (Vita Zahnfabrik) and IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent). The crystalline phase of both materials was determined by quantitative XRD and the G-factor method in the partially and post-crystallization states. The oxide composition of the residual glass phase was derived by subtracting the chemistry of the crystalline phase fractions from the parent glass composition. Mechanical testing of biaxial flexural strength and fracture toughness were used to demonstrate how crack-like defects behave during crystallization.
Results:
The two tested lithium (di)silicate systems showed strong differences in oxide composition of the parent glass. This showed to influence the transformation of lithium metasilicate in lithium disilicate, with the former remaining in high vol.% fraction in the post-crystallization Suprinity PC. In IPS e.max CAD cristobalite precipitated at the surface during the second-heat treatment. Strength and fracture toughness tests revealed that crack in both materials, whether introduced by grinding or indentation, heal during the crystallization firing. Cristobalite seemed to have contributed to a surface strengthening effect in IPS e.max CAD.
Significance:
Accurate crystalline phase quantification aids in the determination of the residual glass composition in dental glass-ceramics. For both systems crystallization firing induced healing of cracks generated by CAM grinding.
Related Concept Videos
01:28The Looking Glass Self
01:28Types of Non-structural Cracks in Concrete
Plastic shrinkage cracks typically form within hours after the concrete is poured. The concrete's surface dries faster than the bottom, creating tensile stress that the still-plastic concrete cannot withstand, leading to diagonal or randomly patterned cracks on the concrete surface.
02:42Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
01:25Crystal Growth: Principles of Crystallization
Initiating crystallization involves manipulating the concentration of the solute and the temperature of the solution. Since crystal growth occurs when the ratio of concentration and solubility of the solute in the solvent...
02:58Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
02:46Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...