Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Executive Function Profiles at Home and at School in 11-Year-Old Very Low Birth Weight or Very Low Gestational Age
Anna Nyman1,2, Petriina Munck2,3, Mari Koivisto4
1Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Insights
Children born at very low birth weight or very low gestational age show executive function (EF) challenges, particularly in working memory at school. Early identification and support in the school environment are recommended for these vulnerable children.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Children born at very low birth weight (VLBW) or very low gestational age (VLGA) often experience executive function (EF) difficulties.
- These EF challenges may manifest differently in academic settings compared to home environments.
- Ecological assessment provides valuable insights into EF in real-world contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate executive function (EF) profiles and associated risk factors in 11-year-old children born at VLBW or VLGA using ecological assessment.
- To compare parent- and teacher-rated EF performance between VLBW/VLGA children and controls.
- To identify specific EF domains and environmental factors influencing outcomes in this population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 125 VLBW/VLGA children and 132 controls were assessed at age 11.
- The Behavior Rating Inventory of EF (BRIEF) was used for parent- and teacher-rated EF, yielding Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition Indexes.
- Full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) was measured using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV); neonatal data were systematically collected.
Main Results:
- VLBW/VLGA children with IQ ≥ 70 demonstrated significant working memory deficits in the school setting.
- Clinically significant behavioral regulation issues were noted at home, but these diminished after adjusting for paternal education.
- Risk factors for poorer EF included lower gestational age, lower birth weight z-score, necrotizing enterocolitis, lower parental education, and lower IQ.
Conclusions:
- This cohort of VLBW/VLGA children exhibited fewer EF problems than reported in prior literature.
- EF challenges varied between home and school settings, with working memory being a key area of concern at school.
- Screening for EF difficulties within the school environment is advised to facilitate targeted interventions and support.
Objective:
Executive function (EF) problems of children born at very low birth weight (VLBW; ≤1500 g) or very low gestational age (VLGA; <32 gestational weeks) may present differently at school compared to the home environment. Ecological assessment of EF including parent- and teacher-rated profiles and associated risk factors of 11-year-old children born at VLBW or VLGA was evaluated.
Methods:
A total of 125 VLBW or VLGA children and 132 controls were assessed using the Behavior Rating Inventory of EF, which includes 8 subscales that form the Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition Indexes. For VLBW or VLGA children, full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence scale for Children, Fourth Edition. Neonatal data were collected systematically.
Results:
VLBW or VLGA children with full-scale IQ ≥ 70 had clinically significant problems in the Working Memory subscale at school. Although they had clinically significant problems at home in the Behavioral Regulation Index, the difference disappeared when adjusted for paternal education. Lower gestational age, lower birth weight z-score, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, low paternal and maternal education, and lower full-scale IQ were identified to be risk factors for higher scores in ecological assessment of EF.
Conclusion:
VLBW or VLGA children in this cohort exhibit fewer EF problems in ecological assessment of EF compared to previous literature. EF problems of this study population vary by home and school setting and are emphasized in working memory at school. Screening for EF problems in school environment is recommended to target the support.
More Related Videos
14:15Measurement Of Neuromagnetic Brain Function In Pre-school Children With Custom Sized MEG
Published on: February 19, 2010
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Mass and Weight
Atomic Weight
Apparent Weight
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...