Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Barriers to Emergency Department Utilization of AFIB Protocol in Uncomplicated Lone AFIB Patients-Results from an
T Britt1, J P Janson1, T Knisely1
1Genesys Regional Medical Center One Genesys Parkway Grand Blanc, MI 48439.
Insights
Emergency physicians find extended ED length of stay and unclear follow-up are major barriers to implementing atrial fibrillation (AFIB) protocols. Addressing these issues is key for developing effective AFIB management strategies in emergency departments.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Traditional atrial fibrillation (AFIB) management often requires hospital admission for rate control and anticoagulation.
- Emerging emergency department (ED) protocols aim to manage lone AFIB without admission, but face physician resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify barriers perceived by emergency physicians (EPs) regarding the implementation of ED AFIB protocols.
- To survey EPs on specific components of ED AFIB management that may hinder protocol utilization.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to a national group of ED physicians to assess perceived barriers to AFIB protocol implementation.
- Data analysis involved descriptive means and weighted averages to identify key impediments.
Main Results:
- Only 17.4% of respondents had existing AFIB protocols; 82.6% did not.
- The primary barriers identified were extended ED length of stay and uncertain discharge follow-up.
- EPs showed minimal concern regarding cardioversion, rate control, or initiating oral anticoagulation, and supported observation placement and discharge planning.
Conclusions:
- EP input is crucial for creating cost-effective, safe, and convenient ED AFIB treatment protocols.
- Addressing ED length of stay and ensuring robust outpatient follow-up are critical for successful protocol design.
Background:
Historically, atrial fibrillation (AFIB) management has focused on rate control and anticoagulation, necessitating hospital admission. Recently, some emergency departments (EDs) have implemented protocols to avoid hospital admission when managing lone AFIB. Despite this recent trend, there is still reluctance toward the implementation of these protocols by some emergency physicians (EPs).
Objective:
This study investigates barriers to implementation of ED AFIB protocols by surveying which aspects may impede their use.
Methods:
To analyze the perceived barriers from EPs, we formulated a survey assessing the various components of ED AFIB management to identify which aspects might impede EP utilization. It was distributed as an email to large national ED physician group. Data was analyzed using descriptive means and weighted averages.
Results:
Of 185 respondents (response rate 6.1%), 17.4% already had AFIB protocols in place at their home institutions and 82.6% did not. Majority opinion of largest barriers toward the implementation of AFIB protocols were the extended ED length of stay and discharge with unclear follow-up. There was little concern with chemical and electrical cardioversion and very limited concern with rate control and initiating oral anticoagulation. EPs supported placement in Observation for implementation and involvement of discharge planning to establish prescriptions and follow-up.
Conclusion:
EP input regarding the development of ED AFib protocols will be essential in order to develop cost effective, convenient and safe methods of treatment. This survey of EP suggests that ED length of stay and insuring close outpatient follow up are key issues to address as protocols are designed.
Related Concept Videos
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Surveys
Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys
Types of Surveys
Survey Safety
Emerging Adulthood

