Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers01:24

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

1.4K
Local anesthetics (LAs) block the sodium channels of nerve trunks, sensory nerve endings, and neuromuscular junctions. Although LAs can block all kinds of nerves, the sensitivity of nerve fibers differs according to nerve types and structures. LAs are known to block myelinated fibers faster than unmyelinated ones. Also, they block pain or sensory neurons at low concentrations without affecting the motor neurons involved in muscle contractions. This helps relieve labor pain without affecting the...
1.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

352
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
352

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cross-sectional analysis of male versus female flourishing among 202,898 participants across 22 countries on 73 variables in the global flourishing study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Spirituality and Harmful or Hazardous Alcohol and Other Drug Use: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Love of neighbor assessment: validity, reliability, and a template for measurement.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Childhood experiences and adult self-rated physical health in 22 countries.

BMC global and public health·2026
Same author

Mental illness, mental health, and mental well-being.

Npj mental health research·2026
Same author

Adolescence in social context: Longitudinal associations of 15 social factors with health and well-being.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

A Simple Way to Measure Ethanol Sensitivity in Flies
11:15

A Simple Way to Measure Ethanol Sensitivity in Flies

Published on: February 19, 2011

24.1K

Simple Sensitivity Analysis for Differential Measurement Error.

Tyler J VanderWeele1, Yige Li1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|May 31, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study quantifies how much measurement error is needed to explain away observed associations. It provides methods to determine the minimum error strength required to account for exposure-outcome links, aiding in bias assessment.

Keywords:
bias analysisdifferentialmeasurement errormisclassificationsensitivity analysis

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.8K
Exfoliation and Analysis of Large-area, Air-Sensitive Two-Dimensional Materials
10:18

Exfoliation and Analysis of Large-area, Air-Sensitive Two-Dimensional Materials

Published on: January 5, 2019

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

A Simple Way to Measure Ethanol Sensitivity in Flies
11:15

A Simple Way to Measure Ethanol Sensitivity in Flies

Published on: February 19, 2011

24.1K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.8K
Exfoliation and Analysis of Large-area, Air-Sensitive Two-Dimensional Materials
10:18

Exfoliation and Analysis of Large-area, Air-Sensitive Two-Dimensional Materials

Published on: January 5, 2019

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Research Methods

Background:

  • Differential measurement error in exposure or outcome can bias epidemiological findings.
  • Quantifying the impact of such errors is crucial for valid study interpretations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods for sensitivity analysis regarding differential measurement error.
  • To establish minimum error thresholds that could explain observed exposure-outcome associations.

Main Methods:

  • Derived formulas for the risk ratio scale when outcome is mismeasured.
  • Derived formulas for the odds ratio scale when exposure is mismeasured.
  • Assessed maximum strength of differential measurement error using controlled direct effects and conditional effects.

Main Results:

  • The true effect size is bounded below by the observed association divided by the maximum measurement error strength.
  • Provides a quantitative measure for the minimum differential measurement error needed to nullify an observed association.

Conclusions:

  • The findings offer a direct way to assess the potential impact of differential measurement error on study results.
  • Enables researchers to evaluate whether observed associations could be artifacts of measurement error.