Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026
Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
Test-retest reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change in the 6-minute walk test in patients with
Anna Sandberg1, Åsa Cider2, Lennart Jivegård3
1Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Objective:
Standardized walk tests are important for objective assessment of walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) has been suggested to correlate more closely than testing on a treadmill with everyday ambulatory function, but its measurement properties have hardly been studied in IC. The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability, agreement, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change of the 6MWT in patients with IC.
Methods:
This reliability and agreement study recruited 102 patients with stable IC (mean age, 72 ± 7.4 years; 43 women) from the vascular surgery outpatient clinic at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Sweden. The patients performed the 6MWT twice, with at least 30 minutes of rest between tests. To determine test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. Bland-Altman plots were used to measure agreement.
Results:
The mean walking distance in both test and retest was 397.8 m (standard deviation, 81.2 m; N = 100), and the individual walking distance varied from 175 to 600 m. Excellent test-retest reliability for the 6MWT (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-0.97) was observed. The SEM was 16.6 m (95% confidence interval, 14.6-19.3), the SEM percentage was 4.2%, and the minimal detectable change was 46 m. Five observations (5%) were positioned outside the limits of agreement; there was a small proportional bias, and the scatter of values for differences decreased as the average values increased.
Conclusions:
The excellent test-retest reliability implies that it is sufficient for a patient with IC to perform the 6MWT once, at every test occasion. For the individual, an improvement or deterioration in maximum walking distance of >46 m after an intervention would be required to be 95% confident that the change is significant. Being a simple and clinically useful test, the 6MWT can be widely used to evaluate the effects of different interventions in patients with IC.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
07:21Walk with Me Hybrid Virtual/In-Person Walking for Older Adults with Neurodegenerative Disease
Published on: June 16, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:29Reliability and Validity
01:12Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
02:19Le Chatelier's Principle: Changing Temperature
To understand this phenomenon, consider the elementary reaction:
02:27Le Chatelier's Principle: Changing Concentration
01:50Global Climate Change
01:17Work Done During Volume Change
Consider a gas confined to a cylinder fitted with a movable piston at one end. If the gas expands from volume V1 to volume V2, it exerts a force on the piston, such that the piston moves by a distance dr.
The work done by the gas on the piston can be expressed as