Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.4K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.4K
Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

7.4K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
7.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

50.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
50.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

80.9K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
80.9K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex differences in task engagement and lapse rate during reward learning.

Oxford open neuroscience·2026
Same author

Sex differences in task engagement and lapse rate during reward learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Social information creates self-fulfilling prophecies in judgments of pain, vicarious pain, and cognitive effort.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Contribution of amygdala to dynamic model arbitration under uncertainty.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

An Information-Theoretic Framework for Understanding Learning and Choice Under Uncertainty.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Neural coding of choice and outcome are modulated by uncertainty in orbitofrontal but not secondary motor cortex.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Brain-spleen axis regulates learned fear.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Acetylcholine: a candidate substrate for hippocampal predictive learning?

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Astrocytes viewed through the lens of their proteomes and subproteomes.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

m<sup>6</sup>A in RNA: a key regulator of brain development, function and disease.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Non-invasive deep-brain neuromodulation by transcranial radio frequency stimulation.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Heading into the wild: setting the course to natural neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Adaptive learning under expected and unexpected uncertainty.

Alireza Soltani1, Alicia Izquierdo2

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. soltani@dartmouth.edu.

Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
|June 1, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adaptive learning requires distinguishing between outcome uncertainty and environmental changes. This study explores computational principles and neural mechanisms for effective decision-making under varying uncertainty levels.

More Related Videos

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
08:04

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

8.7K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K
Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
08:04

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

8.7K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Decision outcomes are often uncertain and can vary.
  • Behavioral adaptation hinges on distinguishing stable from changing reward environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore computational principles and neural mechanisms of adaptive learning under uncertainty.
  • To differentiate between expected and unexpected uncertainty in decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of computational models.
  • Analysis of experimental findings.

Main Results:

  • Adaptive learning necessitates estimating both outcome variability (expected uncertainty) and environmental shifts (unexpected uncertainty).
  • Understanding the interplay between these uncertainties is key.

Conclusions:

  • Distinguishing between expected and unexpected uncertainty is crucial for adaptive learning and decision-making.
  • Further research into computational and neural bases is warranted.