Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Use of a Central Venous Line for Fluids, Drugs and Nutrient Administration in a Mouse Model of Critical Illness
Published on: May 2, 2017
Family Surrogate Decision-making in Chronic Critical Illness: A Qualitative Analysis
Karen O Moss1, Sara L Douglas2, Eric Baum2
1Karen O. Moss is an assistant professor in the College of Nursing at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Sara Douglas is Arline H. & Curtis F. Garvin Professor of Nursing Excellence and Assistant Dean of Research, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Eric Baum is a certified nurse practitioner, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, and a doctoral candidate, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University; Barbara Daly is Gertrude Perkins Oliva Professor in Oncology Nursing, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, and a clinical ethics consultant, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. moss.391@osu.edu.
Background:
Caring for an adult with chronic critical illness is a difficult undertaking. Family surrogates are tasked with decision-making on behalf of their loved one, particularly during acute-on-chronic illness episodes. Critical care nurses are well positioned and well qualified to facilitate this process.
Objectives:
To explore family surrogate decision-making for people with chronic critical illness.
Methods:
In this qualitative study, interviews were conducted with family surrogates (n = 7) as part of a larger descriptive, longitudinal study (N = 264). Content analyses were guided by Miles and colleagues' methods of data analysis.
Results:
Family surrogates serving as decision makers for a spouse or another adult loved one were mostly female. Although decision-making was often described as "frustrating," most surrogates reported that they were "comfortable" with this role. Major decision-making themes were "communication as key in decision-making," "impact of past experiences," and "difficulties and coping." Advice from family and friends, health care providers (such as nurses), and faith or spirituality were significant resources for coping with decision-making challenges.
Conclusions:
Results support recent recommendations of the National Academy of Medicine that endorsed shared decision-making. Data also support development of more effective team communication and decision support strategies, particularly addressing consistency and continuity. Critical care nurses can use their expertise to positively influence these outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Protein Families
Protein Families
Gene Families
Occasionally these regions can be adapted to take on new roles within the organism, becoming novel genes...
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...

