Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Optimization with levosimendan improves outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation
Sinan Sabit Kocabeyoglu1, Umit Kervan1, Dogan Emre Sert1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Preoperative levosimendan infusion in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation was safe and well-tolerated. This therapy improved end-organ functions without increasing adverse events or impacting early outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a critical intervention for advanced heart failure.
- Optimizing patient hemodynamics and end-organ function preoperatively is crucial for successful LVAD outcomes.
- The role of specific inotropic agents like levosimendan in this setting requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the hemodynamic effects of preoperative levosimendan infusion in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.
- To evaluate the impact of levosimendan on early and late prognoses, including right ventricular failure (RVF) and mortality.
- To determine the safety profile of levosimendan in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study included 85 adult patients with dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing LVAD implantation.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Group A received levosimendan plus other inotropes (n=58), and Group B received other inotropes alone (n=27).
- Levosimendan was administered at 0.1 µg/kg/min for up to 48 hours. Primary outcome was early RVF; secondary outcomes included mortality, need for RVAD, late RVF, and end-organ function recovery.
Main Results:
- Patient characteristics were similar between groups.
- No significant differences were observed in early mortality, RVF, need for RVAD, cardiopulmonary bypass time, or ICU stay.
- Survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, as well as freedom from late RVF, were comparable. Levosimendan was safe and well-tolerated.
Conclusions:
- Preoperative levosimendan therapy in LVAD patients is safe and well-tolerated.
- Combined therapy with inotropes and levosimendan significantly improves end-organ function recovery.
- Levosimendan does not appear to negatively impact early hemodynamic outcomes or increase the risk of RVF in LVAD recipients.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Optimal Foraging
Optimization Problems
Improving Translational Accuracy

