Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
Published on: July 5, 2024
A comparative study of the mechanical properties of a dinosaur and crocodile fossil teeth
Lakshminath Kundanati1, Mirco D'Incau2, Massimo Bernardi3
1Laboratory of Bio-inspired and Graphene Nanomechanics, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, 38123, Italy.
Abstract:
Vertebrate teeth are complex structures adapted in terms of shape and structure to serve a variety of functions like biting and grinding. Thus, examining the morphology, composition and mechanical properties of the teeth can aid in providing insights into the feeding behaviour of extinct species. We here provide the first mechanical characterisation of teeth in a spinosaurid dinosaur, Suchomimus tenerensis, and a pholidosaurid crocodylomorph, Sarcosuchus imperator. Our results show that both species have similar macrostructure of enamel, dental and interfacial layers, and similar composition, the main constituent being fluorapatite. Microindentation tests show that Suchomimus teeth have lower elastic modulus and hardness, as compared to Sarchosuchus. On the contrary, Sarcosuchus teeth have lower toughness. Nanoindentation showed the existence of mechanical gradients from dentin to enamel in Suchomimus and, less prominently, in Sarcosuchus. This was also supported by wear tests showing that in Suchomimus the dentin region is more wear-prone than the enamel region. With still scarce information available on the dietary regimes in extinct species, the analysis of micro and nano-mechanical properties of fossils teeth might be a help in targeting specific biological questions. However, much is still unknown concerning the changes underwent by organic material during diagenesis making at present impossible to definitely conclude if the differences in the mechanical properties of Suchomimus and Sarchosuchus here retrieved imply that the two species adopted different strategies when dealing with food processing or are the result of disparate taphonomic histories.
More Related Videos
14:52Isolation, Characterization and Comparative Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells Derived from Permanent Teeth by Using Two Different Methods
Published on: November 24, 2012
10:14Author Spotlight: Leaf Trait Analysis for Climate and Ecology Reconstruction in Modern and Ancient Plant Communities
Published on: October 25, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Fossil Record
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Comparative Excretory Systems
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
Properties of Transition Metals