Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Syngeneic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model to Study the Effects of Irreversible Electroporation
Published on: June 8, 2018
Image-guided Irreversible Electroporation of Localized Prostate Cancer: Functional and Oncologic Outcomes
Federico Collettini1, Judith Enders1, Carsten Stephan1
1From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., J.E., T.F., A.D.J.B., T.P., B.H.) and Urology (C.S., J.B., B.G.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (F.C., T.P.); and Department of Urology, Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany (C.S.).
Abstract:
Background Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablative method based on the formation of nanoscale defects in cell membranes leading to cell death. Clinical experience with the technique for treatment of prostate cancer remains limited. Purpose To evaluate urogenital toxicity and oncologic outcome of MRI-transrectal US fusion-guided IRE of localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, men with biopsy-proven, treatment-naive, low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], ≤15 ng/mL; Gleason score, ≤3 + 4; clinical stage, ≤T2c; lesion size at multiparametric MRI, ≤20 mm) underwent focal MRI/transrectal US fusion-guided IRE between July 2014 and July 2017. Primary end point was the urogenital toxicity profile of focal IRE by using participant-reported questionnaires. Secondary end points were biochemical, histologic, and imaging measures of oncologic control. Analyses were performed by using nonparametric and χ2 test statistics. Results Thirty men were included (median age, 65.5 years); mean PSA level was 8.65 ng/mL and mean tumor size was 13.5 mm. One grade III adverse event (urethral stricture) was recorded. The proportion of men with erection sufficient for penetration was 83.3% (25 of 30) at baseline and 79.3% (23 of 29; P > .99) at 12 months. Leak-free and pad-free continence rate was 90% (27 of 30) at baseline and 86.2% (25 of 29; P > .99) at 12 months. Urogenital function remained stable at 12 months according to changes in the modified International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, or ICIQ-MLUTS, and the International Index of Erectile Function, or IIEF-5, questionnaires (P = .58 and P = .07, respectively). PSA level decreased from a baseline median value of 8.65 ng/mL (interquartile range, 5-11.4 ng/mL) to 2.35 ng/mL (interquartile range, 1-3.4 ng/mL) at 12 months (P < .001). At 6 months, 28 of 30 participants underwent posttreatment biopsy. The rate of in-field treatment failure was 17.9% (five of 28) as determined with multiparametric prostate MRI and targeted biopsies at 6 months. Conclusion After a median follow-up of 20 months, focal irreversible electroporation of localized prostate cancer was associated with low urogenital toxicity and promising oncologic outcomes. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Insights
Focal irreversible electroporation (IRE) for localized prostate cancer shows low urogenital side effects and promising cancer control. This minimally invasive treatment offers a viable option for patients with low- to intermediate-risk disease.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urology
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablative technique utilizing nanoscale membrane defects for cell death.
- Clinical application of IRE for prostate cancer treatment is not yet widespread.
- Focal IRE offers a precise method for localized tumor ablation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the urogenital toxicity profile of MRI-transrectal US fusion-guided IRE for localized prostate cancer.
- To evaluate the oncologic outcomes, including biochemical, histologic, and imaging results, following focal IRE.
- To determine the safety and efficacy of this minimally invasive approach.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of men with biopsy-proven, localized, low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
- Focal MRI/transrectal US fusion-guided IRE performed between July 2014 and July 2017.
- Urogenital toxicity assessed via participant-reported questionnaires; oncologic control measured by PSA, biopsy, and MRI.
Main Results:
- Thirty men (median age 65.5) with localized prostate cancer treated with focal IRE.
- Low incidence of Grade III adverse events (1 urethral stricture); preserved erectile function (79.3%) and continence (86.2%) at 12 months.
- Significant decrease in PSA levels (P < .001); 17.9% in-field treatment failure rate at 6 months.
Conclusions:
- Focal MRI-transrectal US fusion-guided IRE demonstrates low urogenital toxicity in localized prostate cancer patients.
- The technique shows promising oncologic outcomes with a median follow-up of 20 months.
- Focal IRE is a safe and effective treatment option for select prostate cancer patients.
More Related Videos
05:49Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Reversible and Irreversible Processes
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Local Attraction
Functional Groups