Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Does Conducting a Risk Assessment Facilitate Better Care for Patients at Risk of Pressure Injuries?
Manuela Hödl1, Doris Eglseer, Christa Lohrmann
1At the Medical University of Graz, Institute of Nursing Science, in Graz, Austria, Manuela Hödl, PhD, MSc, BSc, is a university assistant; Doris Eglseer, MSc, PhD(c), is a university assistant; and Christa Lohrmann, PhD, RN, FEANS, is Head of Institute. The authors have disclosed no financial relationships related to this article. Submitted October 30, 2017; accepted in revised form February 6, 2018, published online ahead of print June 1, 2019.
Objective:
To evaluate if the use of a pressure injury (PI) risk assessment is associated with the more frequent use of international evidence-based guideline interventions in patients at risk of PI.
Methods:
Data were collected through a multicenter cross-sectional prevalence study conducted on November 14, 2017. Study authors analyzed data from 532 patients 65 years at risk of PI or older in Austrian hospitals.
Main Outcome Measures:
Repositioning, mobilization, floating heels/heel devices, moisture/barrier cream, patient education, malnutrition screening, referral to a dietitian, and hydration/nutrition management.
Main Results:
The risk assessment was documented on admission for 80% (n = 435) of the at-risk patients. Patients for whom a PI risk assessment was conducted were older and more care dependent, and nearly 20% had a PI compared with patients for whom no risk assessment was conducted upon admission. Conducting a risk assessment led to a statistically significantly higher number of internationally recommended PI preventive interventions being performed for at-risk patients, such as provision of moisture/barrier cream, mobilization specific for PI, malnutrition screening, and floating heels or heel suspension devices.
Conclusions:
These results showed that conducting and documenting a risk assessment led to more recommended interventions being performed. Although such interventions are recommended for all patients, these findings are especially relevant for patients at mild or moderate risk of PI who might be otherwise overlooked, which in turn could reduce hospital-acquired PI rates.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Patient-centered Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Facilitated Transport

