Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Overemphasized "g".

Lazar Stankov1,2

  • 1The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia. lazondi@rocketmail.com.

Journal of Intelligence
|June 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-Cognitive Predictors: Evidence and Implications for Academic Achievement and Cognitive Processing.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

The relationship between closed-mindedness and militant extremism in a post-conflict society.

Aggressive behavior·2022
Same author

Contemporary militant extremism: a linguistic approach to scale development.

Psychological assessment·2010
Same author

Militant extremist mind-set: Proviolence, Vile World, and Divine Power.

Psychological assessment·2010
Same journal

Career Adaptability and Academic Achievement Among Chinese High School Students: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Social Cognitive and Metacognitive Mediating Mechanisms.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Preservice Science Teachers' Analogical Reasoning: Evidence from Analogy Design.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Instruction on Student Learning in STEM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Reading and Writing Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Adolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Emotional Intelligence, Self-Regulation, and Children's Well-Being in Fourth-Grade Students: Cross-Sectional Associations from Türkiye.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Detecting Demographic Influences on Measures of Spatial Ability with Rasch Tree Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
See all related articles

The overemphasis on general intelligence ("g") neglects crucial cognitive abilities. Research should broaden its scope to include abilities from the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory and new psychological constructs.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Intelligence Research

Background:

  • The dominant focus on general intelligence ('g') in cognitive research has led to the neglect of other important cognitive abilities.
  • The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory, which outlines broader cognitive factors, has been underutilized.
  • Current research paradigms often overlook cognitive processes common across sensory modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue that the emphasis on 'g' is a hindrance to studying broadly defined human cognitive abilities.
  • To highlight the neglect of first- and second-stratum factors within the CHC theory.
  • To advocate for the inclusion of newly emerging cognitive constructs and tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing intelligence research and theories.
Keywords:
cognitive biasescomplex problem solvingemotional intelligencegeneral factor“g”

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of recent developments in psychology, education, and economics relevant to cognition.
  • Identification of neglected cognitive abilities and emerging research areas.

    • Main Results:

    • The narrow focus on 'g' has led to the exclusion of abilities captured by CHC theory's broader factors.
    • Cognitive processes common to sensory modalities have been overlooked.
    • New areas like complex problem-solving, emotional intelligence, economic games, and decision-making biases offer valuable insights.

    Conclusions:

    • A broader perspective on human cognitive abilities is necessary, moving beyond the sole focus on 'g'.
    • Integrating CHC theory's broader factors and emerging interdisciplinary constructs will advance cognitive science.
    • Future research should encompass a wider range of cognitive processes and tasks for a more comprehensive understanding of human intelligence.