Carbetocin: Worth the extra expense?

Every six minutes, a mother dies from post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) in low- and middle-income countries, often in the prime of her life and often leaving behind a young family. To prevent PPH, the routine administration of a uterus-contracting ('uterotonic') agent is a standard practice across the world. Oxytocin is the standard uterotonic agent recommended for this purpose, and is recommended for all women giving birth. Oxytocin is problematic as it requires cold storage and transport, and in low-resource settings, the cold chain is not commonly available. Hence, using heat-stable carbetocin in these settings can be advantageous. Heat-stable carbetocin is a promising alternative to oxytocin. Because of its heat stability, it can overcome the persistent problems with oxytocin quality as it does not require cold chain for storage and transport. Considering the totality of the evidence, it appears to have some additional desirable effects compared with oxytocin and a very favourable side effect profile similar to oxytocin. However, because carbetocin costs 20 times more than oxytocin and is not widely available yet, oxytocin remains the mainstay for prevention of PPH. However, this may change as WHO has signed a memorandum of understanding with the manufacturer to provide carbetocin for the public sector of LMIC at a similar price level to that of oxytocin. Currently, carbetocin is being registered in 90 low- and middle-income countries to be made available and improve access to this life-saving uterotonic agent.