Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Home-Based Prescribed Pulmonary Exercise in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: August 24, 2019
Effects of a community-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive
A Machado1, A Oliveira1, C Valente2
1Lab 3R - Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal; Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Background:
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a cornerstone intervention for the management of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its role during acute exacerbations (AECOPD) is controversial since most studies have been conducted in hospitalised patients, when more than 80% of AECOPD are managed on an outpatient basis. This quasi-experimental pilot study assessed the effects of a community-based PR programme during mild-to-moderate AECOPD.
Methods:
Outpatients were recruited from hospitals and allocated to experimental (EG) or control (CG) groups. EG received standard medication plus 3-weeks of PR. The CG received standard medication. Dyspnoea (mMRC), quadriceps muscle strength (QMS), functionality (5-repetition sit-to-stand test) and impact of the disease (COPD assessment test (CAT)) were assessed within 48h of the AECOPD onset and after PR. Symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue (mBorg), heart and respiratory (RR) rates and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were assessed at rest and monitored in all PR sessions. Need for hospitalisation was monitored during the 3-weeks.
Results:
Twelve patients (69±7 years, FEV1 52±27 pp) in the EG and eleven in the CG (66±9 years, FEV1 55±22 pp) were enrolled. The EG presented significant improvements on QMS (Pre 21.0 vs. Post 25.0, p=0.012), CAT (Pre 23.0 vs. Post 14.5, p=0.008), symptoms of dyspnoea at rest (Pre 3.0 vs. Post 1.0, p=0.008), SpO2 (Pre 94.0 vs. Post 96.0, p=0.031) and RR (Pre 24.0 vs. Post 20.5, p=0.004). No significant improvements were found in the CG.
Conclusion:
Adding PR to the management of mild-to-moderate AECOPD seems to result in improvements on parameters usually associated with an increased risk of re-exacerbation and poor prognosis. Randomised studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these results.
More Related Videos
04:53Author Spotlight: Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sleep Disorders in Acute COPD — A Safe, Cost-Effective Approach
Published on: October 18, 2024
04:03Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Moving Cupping Along Meridians for Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History