Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

An Immature Murine Model of Reversible Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction
Published on: April 4, 2025
Factors predictive of shockwave lithotripsy failure for ureteral stones: why we need to hurry
Giorgio Mazzon1, Nicola Pavan2, Gaetano Chiapparrone3
1Institute of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Background:
The aims of this study are to evaluate the prognostic factors of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with ureteric stones, and to identify which patients might directly benefit of an endoscopic treatment.
Methods:
We performed a prospective study from January 2013 and July 2016 on patients with single ureteric stone and undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). We divided patients into two groups: first group (success group) included cases resolved with SWL only, and a second group (failure group) including patients with stone not resolved by SWL and requiring an endoscopic treatment. We evaluated age, weight, height, body mass index, stone size, hydronephrosis, laterality, location, days elapsed from onset of symptoms to SWL and stone density when computed tomography was performed. In case of stone fragments >4 mm, the procedure was repeated up to a maximum of three times. SWL was considered as failed if patients had a residual stone of any size after a follow-up of 3 months or if a complication occurred.
Results:
274 patients completed follow-up and were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 53.22 years (standard deviation: 13.98). SWL overall success rate was 84.3% (231 patients successfully treated with shockwaves) and failure rate was 15.7% (43 patients underwent auxiliary endoscopic procedure). At the univariate analysis, we observed a statistically significant difference for hydronephrosis (P=0.006), time elapsed from symptoms onset (P=0.013), patients' age (P=0.06) and mean stone density (0.023). In the multivariate logistic regression, patients' age (OR: 1.517), and time elapsed from obstruction to SWL (OR: 3.005) were independent predictive factors for SWL failure. Furthermore, moderate and severe hydronephrosis seemed to be independent predictive factors for SWL failure, presenting an OR of 2.451 and 4.207 respectively. High stone density resulted to be a predictive factor for SWL failure (OR: 2.293 if density was higher than 1100 Hounsfield Units).
Conclusions:
We report a large series of patients undergone primary SWL for ureteric stones. Our data demonstrated the role of hydronephrosis, time elapsed from obstruction onset to treatment and stone density as independent predictive factors of SWL failure.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
03:50Author Spotlight: Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Achilles Tendinopathy Treatment
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Types of Building Stone
Igneous rocks are formed from the solidification of magma or lava. An example is granite, known for its durability and resistance to weathering, making it ideal for parts of...
Quarrying of Stone
One common method involves using a diamond belt saw to cut large blocks from the quarry face. These blocks can be about 50 feet long and 12 feet high. After the initial vertical cut, drilling is performed at the base of the...
Stone Masonry
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Transcription Factors