Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Isolation and Time-Lapse Imaging of Primary Mouse Embryonic Palatal Mesenchyme Cells to Analyze Collective Movement Attributes
Published on: February 13, 2021
Hospital Volume Improves Primary, Revision, and Delayed Cleft Palate Repair
Robin T Wu1, Blake N Shultz1, Connor J Peck1
1Yale School of Medicine.
Insights
High volume centers (HVC) demonstrate improved outcomes in cleft palate repair compared to non-high volume centers (NHVC). HVCs showed lower complication rates and shorter hospital stays for cleft palate surgeries.
Area of Science:
- Cleft lip and palate surgery
- Pediatric surgery outcomes
- Health services research
Background:
- High volume centers (HVC) are often linked to enhanced resources and better patient outcomes.
- This study investigates the effectiveness and results of HVCs in cleft palate repair.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and outcomes of cleft palate repair in high volume centers (HVC) versus non-high volume centers (NHVC).
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Kids' Inpatient Database (2003-2009) to identify cleft palate procedures.
- Compared demographics, perioperative factors, comorbidities, and complications between HVC (>48 cases/year) and NHVC.
Main Results:
- HVCs performed 61.7% of cleft palate surgeries, treating younger patients and performing more concurrent procedures.
- NHVCs served a higher proportion of Medicaid and low-income patients.
- HVCs exhibited lower overall length of stay and specific complication rates, including pneumonia and wound complications, for primary repairs.
Conclusions:
- High volume centers demonstrate superior outcomes in cleft palate repair, characterized by reduced complications and shorter hospital stays.
- Despite serving a different demographic, HVCs provide better results for cleft palate surgeries.
Background:
High volume centers (HVC) is commonly associated with increased resources and improved patient outcomes. This study assesses efficacy and outcomes of high volume centers in cleft palate repair.
Methods:
Cleft palate procedures were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database from 2003-2009. Demographics, perioperative factors, co-morbidities, and complications in HVC (90th percentile, >48 cases/year) and non-high volume centers (NHVC) were compared across various cohorts of cleft repair.
Results:
Four thousand five hundred sixty-three (61.7%) total cleft palate surgeries were performed in HVC and 3388 (38.3%) were performed in NHVC. The NHVC treated a higher percentage of Medicaid patients (P = 0.005) and patients from low-income quartiles (P = 0.018). HVC had larger bedsizes (P <0.001), were more often government/private owned (P <0.001), and were more often teaching hospitals (P <0.001) located predominantly in urban settings (P <0.001). The HVC treated patients at younger ages (P = 0.008) and performed more concurrent procedures (P = 0.047). The most common diagnosis at HVC was complete cleft palate with incomplete cleft lip, while the most common diagnosis at NHVC was incomplete cleft palate without lip. Overall, length of stay and specific complication rates were lower in HVC (P = 0.048, P = 0.042). Primaries at HVCs showed lower pneumonia (P = 0.009) and specific complication rates (P = 0.023). Revisions at HVC were associated with older patients, fewer cardiac complications (P = 0.040), less wound disruption (P = 0.050), but more hemorrhage (P = 0.040).
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I
Mismatch Repair
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair

