Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
A Biologically Supported Error-Correcting Learning Rule
Peter J B Hancock1, Leslie S Smith1, William A Phillips1
1Centre for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Departments of Computing Science and Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA.
Abstract:
We show that a form of synaptic plasticity recently discovered in slices of the rat visual cortex (Artola et al. 1990) can support an error-correcting learning rule. The rule increases weights when both pre- and postsynaptic units are highly active, and decreases them when pre-synaptic activity is high and postsynaptic activation is less than the threshold for weight increment but greater than a lower threshold. We show that this rule corrects false positive outputs in feedforward associative memory, that in an appropriate opponent-unit architecture it corrects misses, and that it performs better than the optimal Hebbian learning rule reported by Willshaw and Dayan (1990).
More Related Videos
08:18High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon
Published on: June 16, 2020
09:34A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
Published on: September 25, 2021
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Exceptions to the Octet Rule
Lewis Symbols and the Octet Rule
The Aufbau Principle and Hund's Rule
Distance Corrections
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...