Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared With Medical Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease in
Satoshi Kodera1, Hiroyuki Morita1, Arihiro Kiyosue1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is cost-effective for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Japan. For angina pectoris (AP), fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI is cost-effective for symptomatic patients but not for asymptomatic ones.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- The cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemic heart disease in Japan remains unclear.
- This study aimed to evaluate the economic value of PCI versus medical therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and angina pectoris (AP).
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the cost-effectiveness of PCI compared to medical therapy for STEMI and AP in Japan.
- To determine the economic viability of PCI based on health system perspective and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
Main Methods:
- Markov models were utilized to assess costs and benefits of PCI versus medical therapy for STEMI and AP.
- Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated, with a threshold of ¥5 million per QALY gained considered cost-effective.
- Data on PCI's impact on cardiovascular events were derived from existing literature.
Main Results:
- For STEMI patients, PCI demonstrated a cost-effectiveness of ¥0.97 million per QALY gained, with a 99.9% probability of being cost-effective.
- For symptomatic AP patients, FFR-guided PCI yielded an ICER of ¥4.63 million per QALY gained, with a 50.4% cost-effectiveness probability.
- FFR-guided PCI for asymptomatic patients with myocardial ischemia was not cost-effective, with an ICER of ¥23 million per QALY gained.
Conclusions:
- PCI is a cost-effective treatment option for STEMI patients in Japan compared to medical therapy.
- FFR-guided PCI may be a cost-effective strategy for symptomatic AP patients but not for asymptomatic individuals with myocardial ischemia.
Background:
The cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemic heart disease is undetermined in Japan. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of PCI compared with medical therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and angina pectoris (AP) in Japan.
Methods And Results:
We used Markov models for STEMI and AP to assess the costs and benefits associated with PCI or medical therapy from a health system perspective. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and ICER <¥5 m per QALY gained was judged to be cost-effective. The impact of PCI on cardiovascular events was based on previous publications. In STEMI patients, the ICER of PCI over medical treatment was ¥0.97 m per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness probability of PCI was 99.9%. In AP patients, the ICER of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI over medical treatment was ¥4.63 m per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness probability of PCI was 50.4%. The ICER of FFR-guided PCI for asymptomatic patients was ¥23 m per QALY gained.
Conclusions:
In STEMI patients, PCI was cost-effective compared with medical therapy. In AP patients, FFR-guided PCI for symptomatic patients could be cost-effective compared with medical therapy. FFR-guided PCI for asymptomatic patients with myocardial ischemia was not cost-effective.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology

