Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Experimental Melanoma Immunotherapy Model Using Tumor Vaccination with a Hematopoietic Cytokine
Published on: February 24, 2023
Evaluation of the efficacy of immunotherapy for non-resectable mucosal melanoma
Antoine Moya-Plana1,2, Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gómez3, Caroline Rossoni4
1Head and Neck Surgery Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France. antoine.moya-plana@gustaveroussy.fr.
Background:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now standard-of-care treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, for rare sub-groups, such as mucosal melanomas, few published data are available, and with no established therapeutic guidelines. Our objective was to assess the response to anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with mucosal melanomas.
Methods:
We performed a single-center, prospective cohort analysis of patients with non-surgical locally advanced and/or metastatic mucosal melanoma receiving anti-CTLA4 and/or anti-PD1 immunotherapy from 2010 to 2016.
Results:
Forty-four patients were enrolled, including 18 (40.9%) with head and neck, 12 (27.3%) with vulvo-vaginal and 14 (31.8%) with ano-rectal primary tumours. Eleven (25%) patients had stage 3 disease, and 11 (25%) had distant metastases. The first-line immunotherapy was ipilimumab in 24 patients and pembrolizumab in 20. The objective response rate (ORR) was 8.2% (one complete response) for ipilimumab and 35% (four complete responses) for pembrolizumab. No significant difference was observed for primary tumour location. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 4-73). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line ipilimumab and pembrolizumab groups was 3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-4.6] and 5 months (95% CI 2.6-33.1), respectively (p = 0.0147).
Conclusion:
In the patients with unresectable and/or metastatic mucosal melanoma, we found ORR and PFS rates comparable to those in patients with cutaneous melanoma, with no significant differences in the types of mucosal surfaces involved. Anti-PD1 therapy has a more favorable benefit-risk ratio than ipilimumab and should be used preferentially.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 show promise for mucosal melanomas. Anti-PD1 therapy demonstrated a better benefit-risk ratio compared to ipilimumab in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Melanoma Research
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
- Limited data exist for rare mucosal melanoma subtypes, lacking established treatment guidelines.
- This study assesses ICI response in mucosal melanoma patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with mucosal melanomas.
- To compare treatment outcomes across different mucosal sites.
- To determine the optimal ICI strategy for mucosal melanoma.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort analysis of 44 patients with locally advanced/metastatic mucosal melanoma.
- Treatment included anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) and/or anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) from 2010-2016.
- Analysis of objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Main Results:
- Pembrolizumab showed a 35% ORR versus 8.2% for ipilimumab.
- Median PFS was 5 months for pembrolizumab and 3 months for ipilimumab (p=0.0147).
- Response rates were similar across head and neck, vulvo-vaginal, and ano-rectal primary sites.
Conclusions:
- Mucosal melanoma patients achieved ORR and PFS comparable to cutaneous melanoma patients.
- No significant differences in outcomes were observed based on mucosal site.
- Anti-PD1 therapy offers a superior benefit-risk profile and should be prioritized over ipilimumab.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Mucosal Barrier of the Stomach
Within parietal cells, carbonic acid is first formed through the reaction of water and carbon dioxide. The dissociation of carbonic acid releases bicarbonate and hydrogen ions. The bicarbonate...
Self-Efficacy
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

