Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Retinal and Choroidal Thickness Changes in Populations with Helicobacter pylori Infection by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: November 1, 2024
Francesco Sabatino1, Francesco Matarazzo1, Oliver Findl2
1Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Purpose:
To report the level of agreement, repeatability, and correlation of axial length (AL), mean keratometry, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and corneal diameter measurements of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, the IOLMaster 700 (reference biometer) and the Argos (new biometer).
Setting:
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Design:
Retrospective case series.
Methods:
Each patient had SS-OCT biometry with the reference biometer and new biometer. In addition to reporting the statistical results derived from both eyes, this study included a subgroup analysis of right eyes and left eyes. The level of agreement between the biometers was represented with the Bland-Altman method. Power vector analysis of the J0 (Jackson cross-cylinder, axes at 0 degrees and 90 degrees) and J45 (Jackson cross-cylinder, axes at 45 degrees and 135 degrees) vectorial components of astigmatism was performed. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach α coefficient of reliability. The dispersion of probability distribution was computed with the coefficient of variation. The intraoperator repeatability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:
The study comprised 112 patients (218 eyes). There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 biometers in all measurements (P < .05) except AL. The level of correlation between the reference biometer and the new biometer was very high for all the parameters except corneal diameter, and the agreement was high. The ICC and internal consistency were excellent with both biometers.
Conclusion:
The new biometer provided good agreement and repeatability compared with the reference biometer.
More Related Videos
11:21Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: January 15, 2013
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mesh Analysis with Current Sources
Current Source in One Mesh: The analysis process is straightforward when a current source is found in only one mesh within the circuit. Mesh currents are assigned as usual, with the mesh containing the current source excluded from the analysis. Kirchhoff's voltage law...
Nodal Analysis with Voltage Sources
Consider a circuit that contains four resistors and two voltage sources, as shown in Figure 1. One of these voltage sources is connected between a...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Comparative Excretory Systems