Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Management of Open Abdominal Aortic Graft Infections

Ivo C J H Post1, Cornelis G Vos2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Insights

In situ repair using prosthetic grafts offers the best outcomes for aortic graft infection (AGI), reducing 30-day mortality and improving one-year survival. Partial graft removal should be avoided in AGI management.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

  • Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a severe complication following aortic surgery, occurring in 0.2-6% of patients.
  • Optimal management strategies for AGI lack high-quality evidence, leading to uncertainty in treatment decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the literature on managing open abdominal aortic graft infections.
  • To determine the optimal treatment strategies for AGI based on available evidence.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines was performed.
  • Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  • Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies (MINORS) score.

Main Results:

  • Thirty-two studies involving 1574 initially identified papers were included, with moderate overall quality (average MINORS score 11.9).
  • Pooled 30-day mortality was 13.5% and one-year survival was 73.6%.
  • In situ repair demonstrated lower 30-day mortality and higher one-year survival compared to extra-anatomic repair; prosthetic grafts showed better survival than venous grafts or arterial allografts, but with higher infection recurrence.

Conclusions:

  • High-quality comparative studies are lacking, limiting definitive recommendations for AGI management.
  • Current data suggest avoiding partial graft removal and favoring in situ repair with prosthetic grafts for better survival outcomes.
  • Collaborative prospective data collection initiatives are crucial for advancing understanding and treatment of AGI.

Related Concept Videos

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is when the aortic valve does not close or seal properly, leading to backward blood circulation from the aorta into the left ventricle during diastole. Common causes of AR include rheumatic heart disease, congenital valve defects, and aortic root dilation. Managing AR requires a multifaceted approach to alleviate symptoms, preserve left ventricular function, and address the underlying cause of the regurgitation. Patients with symptomatic AR or significant left...
416
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management01:17

Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

A nurse managing a patient with aortic regurgitation begins with a comprehensive assessment, including a review of the patient's medical history, family history, and lifestyle factors. During the cardiac examination, the nurse listens for heart sounds and checks for signs of valve abnormalities. The nurse also observes for symptoms such as dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and assesses the patient's endurance and daily activity tolerance.Based on the findings, the nurse...
297
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management01:17

Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management

In managing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing, a comprehensive assessment is essential. Begin by gathering subjective data, such as the patient’s complaints of dysuria (painful urination), urinary frequency, urgency, suprapubic pain, and any lower abdominal discomfort. This information can be complemented by questions regarding previous UTIs, sexual activity, and personal hygiene practices, which can provide insight into risk factors. Objective assessment should focus on signs...
447
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.6K