Neurodevelopmental Treatment (Bobath) for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review

Márcia Andréa Zanon1, Rafael Leite Pacheco2,3, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca3,4

  • 11 Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Alagoas (AL), Brazil.

Insights

The effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy remain uncertain. Current evidence does not support its routine use, and more research is needed to confirm efficacy and safety.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Physical Therapy

Background:

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of disorders affecting movement and posture, impacting children's development.
  • Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) is a common approach used in pediatric physical therapy for children with CP.
  • The efficacy of NDT compared to conventional physical therapy requires rigorous evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) with conventional physical therapy (PT) for children with cerebral palsy.
  • To assess the effects of NDT on gross motor function in children with CP.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review was conducted following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA Statement guidelines.
  • Included were RCTs comparing NDT to conventional PT in children with CP.
  • Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Main Results:

  • Three RCTs (2 published, 1 ongoing) involving 66 children were included.
  • Published RCTs had methodological and reporting limitations.
  • No significant difference was found in gross motor function between NDT and conventional PT (low certainty evidence).

Conclusions:

  • The effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy are currently uncertain.
  • Further high-quality studies are necessary to establish the efficacy and safety of NDT.
  • Current evidence does not support the routine implementation of NDT in clinical practice for CP.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.6K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
12.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K