Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System ANS Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges
Published on: February 25, 2016
Challenges in measuring ACGME competencies: considerations for milestones.
Prathiba Natesan1, Nicholas J Batley2, Rinad Bakhti3
1Department of Educational Psychology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311335, Denton, TX, 76203, USA.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency evaluations show severe multicollinearity, indicating poor validity. Current tools may not accurately assess resident performance, suggesting a need for improved evaluation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education Research
- Graduate Medical Training Assessment
- Competency-Based Education
Background:
- Ensuring resident competency is crucial for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standards.
- Previous research indicates physicians often use global ratings, relying on single criteria for evaluations.
- This study examines the validity of ACGME International competency measures in an international context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) International competency measures in emergency medicine (EM) and neurology.
- To analyze the performance of these measures across different evaluators and specialties.
- To identify potential issues with current competency assessment tools used in resident training.
Main Methods:
- Advanced statistical analysis, including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), was applied to EM and neurology data.
- CFA models were tested and modified based on fit indices to assess construct validity.
- Measurement invariance tests were conducted to examine differences in competency perception among EM physicians.
Main Results:
- High reliability coefficients and factor loadings (>.93) indicated significant multicollinearity among evaluated items.
- This multicollinearity suggests that most items were redundant and measured the same underlying construct.
- The findings were consistent across both EM and neurology datasets and all six EM faculty evaluators.
Conclusions:
- Evaluation forms for the six core ACGME competencies lack adequate validity due to severe multicollinearity.
- The upcoming ACGME milestones with numerous sub-competencies may exacerbate existing assessment flaws if tool weaknesses are ignored.
- A more effective evaluation process should acknowledge and incorporate physician subjectivity for more meaningful feedback.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...
Transmission Line Design Considerations

