Comparison of a Pragmatic and Regression Approach for Wearable EEG Signal Quality Assessment

Wearable electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions allow portability and real-time measurements in uncontrolled conditions. For reliable and reproducible interpretation of the EEG data, it is essential to accurately identify EEG segments contaminated by artefacts. Two data quality indicator approaches are proposed: pragmatic and regression based. The former extracts statistical features and applies data-driven thresholding, while the latter uses a regression model on the same set of statistical features to predict data quality. The performance of the approaches is validated against EEG data recorded during uncontrolled laboratory and free-living conditions, and compared to a validated approach. The proposed approaches achieve average accuracy of over [Formula: see text] in detecting artefactual data, which is higher than the FORCe signal quality estimation method ([Formula: see text]). The main strength of the proposed algorithms is in the significant increase of specificity over the state-of-the-art. The two models perform equally across different databases. Training of the two approaches on free-living conditions data showed better generalization when tested on different types of databases, i.e., uncontrolled laboratory and free-living. Although the accuracy in determining artefact-contaminated data is highest when using a window size of 8 s, the accuracy drop is minor when using shorter window size, demonstrating another advantage over existing methods. Given low complexity of both pragmatic and regression approach, it facilitates a real-time implementation, which is demonstrated using a wearable EEG headset system available at IMEC.