Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)01:15

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)

1.1K
This procedural guide systematically measures blood pressure using an oscillometric digital sphygmomanometer, emphasizing accuracy, patient safety, and comfort.
Prepare for the Procedure:
1.1K
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)01:23

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

1.5K
Measuring blood pressure is a fundamental skill in healthcare that aids in diagnosing and monitoring hypertension and other cardiovascular conditions. An aneroid sphygmomanometer, commonly used in clinical settings, offers a manual and precise method for blood pressure measurement. The technique for using this instrument involves specific steps that must be carefully executed to ensure accuracy. The following detailed description outlines a two-step technique for assessing blood pressure using...
1.5K
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods01:29

Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods

23.5K
As used in a healthcare facility, sterilization destroys all microorganisms through physical or chemical methods. The physical method includes steam, dry heat, boiling water, and radiation.
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
23.5K
Assessment of the Mouth01:26

Assessment of the Mouth

1.1K
A thorough mouth assessment, including inspection and palpation of the lips, gums, tongue, tonsils, uvula, and pharynx, is crucial in detecting potential health issues. Diseases ranging from oral cancer to systemic conditions like diabetes could be identified early through careful oral examination. This article provides a detailed guide on conducting a comprehensive mouth assessment.
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
1.1K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

65.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
65.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

260.6K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
260.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An intraocular oxygenated emulsion suppresses retinal fibrosis by inhibiting hypoxia-driven bioenergetic shifts and mesenchymal transformation.

Research square·2026
Same author

Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor in Pediatric Neuropathic Keratopathy: A Focus on Corneal Opacities, Amblyopia, and Visual Outcomes.

Cornea·2026
Same author

Cytocompatibility of PMMA and Titanium Boston Keratoprosthesis Backplates with Human Corneal Fibroblasts.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Besifloxacin-eluting contact lens with sustained drug delivery and enhanced bioavailability.

International journal of pharmaceutics: X·2026
Same author

Correction: Ciprofloxacin-loaded bioadhesive hydrogels for ocular applications.

Biomaterials science·2026
Same author

Clinical Characteristics of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease Associated With Tapering of Immunosuppressive Drugs.

Cornea·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Porcine Corneal Endothelial Organ Culture Model Using Split Corneal Buttons
08:36

A Porcine Corneal Endothelial Organ Culture Model Using Split Corneal Buttons

Published on: October 6, 2019

7.5K

Methods for Assessing Corneal Opacity.

Thomas H Dohlman1, Jia Yin1, Reza Dana1

  • 1a Schepens Eye Research Institute/Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.

Seminars in Ophthalmology
|June 13, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying corneal opacity, a common cause of vision impairment, lacks standardized methods. This review summarizes current objective assessment options for clinicians and researchers, highlighting the need for an accessible, easy-to-use solution.

Keywords:
CorneaOCTfibrosisimagingopacity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Decoding Corneal Neovascularization with Alkali Burn Model for Future Therapeutic Strategies
04:17

Author Spotlight: Decoding Corneal Neovascularization with Alkali Burn Model for Future Therapeutic Strategies

Published on: June 30, 2023

3.9K
An Alkali-burn Injury Model of Corneal Neovascularization in the Mouse
10:52

An Alkali-burn Injury Model of Corneal Neovascularization in the Mouse

Published on: April 7, 2014

17.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Porcine Corneal Endothelial Organ Culture Model Using Split Corneal Buttons
08:36

A Porcine Corneal Endothelial Organ Culture Model Using Split Corneal Buttons

Published on: October 6, 2019

7.5K
Author Spotlight: Decoding Corneal Neovascularization with Alkali Burn Model for Future Therapeutic Strategies
04:17

Author Spotlight: Decoding Corneal Neovascularization with Alkali Burn Model for Future Therapeutic Strategies

Published on: June 30, 2023

3.9K
An Alkali-burn Injury Model of Corneal Neovascularization in the Mouse
10:52

An Alkali-burn Injury Model of Corneal Neovascularization in the Mouse

Published on: April 7, 2014

17.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Corneal opacity is a prevalent clinical issue that impairs light transmission, significantly affecting vision.
  • Currently, there are no universally accepted standard methods for quantifying the severity of corneal opacity.
  • Objective assessment of corneal opacity is crucial for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive review of existing literature on methods for objectively assessing corneal opacity.
  • To summarize the various techniques available to clinicians and researchers for quantifying corneal opacity and transparency.
  • To identify gaps and unmet needs in the objective assessment of corneal opacity.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific literature was performed.
  • The review focused on studies reporting methods for assessing corneal opacity and transparency in both clinical and research settings.
  • Literature search terms included "corneal opacity," "corneal transparency," "objective assessment," and "quantification methods."

Main Results:

  • Multiple techniques for assessing corneal opacity have been reported in the literature.
  • These methods range from subjective clinical grading to advanced imaging modalities.
  • Despite the variety of reported techniques, no single method has achieved widespread adoption in clinical practice or research.

Conclusions:

  • There is a significant need for a standardized, accessible, objective, and user-friendly method for quantifying corneal opacity.
  • The lack of a widely adopted method hinders consistent diagnosis, treatment evaluation, and comparative research.
  • Further development and validation of novel assessment tools are warranted to address this clinical challenge.