Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Long-Term Continuous Measurement of Renal Blood Flow in Conscious Rats
Published on: February 8, 2022
Prophylactic Intravenous Hydration to Protect Renal Function From Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Material
Estelle C Nijssen1, Patty J Nelemans2, Roger J Rennenberg3
1Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Background:
The aim of A MAastricht Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Guideline (AMACING) trial was to evaluate non-inferiority of no prophylaxis compared to guideline-recommended prophylaxis in preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN), and to explore the effect on long-term post-contrast adverse outcomes. The current paper presents the long-term results.
Methods:
AMACING is a single-centre, randomised, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 combined with risk factors, undergoing elective procedures requiring intravenous or intra-arterial iodinated contrast material. Exclusion criteria were eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, dialysis, no referral for prophylaxis. The outcomes dialysis, mortality, and change in renal function at 1 year post-contrast were secondary outcomes of the trial. Subgroup analyses were performed based on pre-defined stratification risk factors. AMACING is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02106234.
Findings:
From 28,803 referrals, 1120 at-risk patients were identified. 660 consecutive patients agreed to participate and were randomly assigned (1:1) to no prophylaxis (n = 332) or standard prophylactic intravenous hydration (n = 328). Dialysis and mortality data were available for all patients. At 365 days post-contrast dialysis was recorded in two no prophylaxis (2/332, 0.60%), and two prophylaxis patients (2/328, 0.61%; p = 0.9909); mortality was recorded for 36/332 (10.84%) no prophylaxis, and 32/328 (9.76%) prophylaxis patients (p = 0.6490). The hazard ratio was 1.118 (no prophylaxis vs prophylaxis) for one-year risk of death (95% CI: 0.695 to 1.801, p = 0.6449). The differences in long-term changes in serum creatinine were small between groups, and gave no indication of a disadvantage for the no-prophylaxis group.
Interpretation:
Assuming optimal contrast administration, not giving prophylaxis to elective patients with eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 is safe, even in the long-term.
Funding:
Stichting de Weijerhorst.
Related Concept Videos
Aqueous Solutions and Heats of Hydration
When ionic compounds dissolve in water, the ions in the solid separate and disperse uniformly throughout the solution because water molecules surround and solvate the ions, reducing the strong electrostatic forces between them. This process...
Hydration of Cement
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests
Transfer Function in Control Systems
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Long-term Depression

