Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Dendrimer-based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: December 4, 2016
Immediate Hypersensitivity to Contrast Agents: The French 5-year CIRTACI Study
Olivier Clement1,2, Pascale Dewachter3, Claudie Mouton-Faivre4
1Assistance Publique Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service de Radiologie 20 rue Leblanc Paris, FR 75015, France.
Differentiating allergic from non-allergic immediate hypersensitivity (IH) reactions to iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media (ICM; GBCM) is vital. Allergy diagnosis impacts future contrast media use, with skin testing showing promise.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging
- Allergy and Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Immediate hypersensitivity (IH) reactions are associated with iodinated (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM).
- Distinguishing allergic from non-allergic IH reactions is critical for patient management, as true allergy mandates avoidance of the causative agent.
- This study investigated the frequency of allergic IH reactions in patients exposed to ICM or GBCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency of allergic immediate hypersensitivity (IH) reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM).
- To compare the characteristics of allergic, potentially allergic, and non-allergic IH reactions.
- To evaluate the utility of skin testing in diagnosing allergic reactions to contrast media.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study involving 245 patients who experienced IH reactions to ICM or GBCM between 2005 and 2009.
- Clinical symptoms, plasma histamine and tryptase levels, and skin tests (intradermal tests with diluted and pure contrast media) were recorded.
- Allergic IH was diagnosed by positive intradermal tests (IDT) with 1:10 diluted CM, potentially allergic IH by positive IDT with pure CM, and non-allergic IH by negative IDT.
Main Results:
- Allergic IH reactions were identified in 19.6% of ICM reactors and 27.8% of GBCM reactors.
- Skin cross-reactivity was observed in 26.8% of ICM reactors and 50% of GBCM reactors.
- Allergy frequency correlated with clinical severity, mediator release (histamine, tryptase), and cardiovascular signs; non-allergic reactions were generally less severe and had a longer delay.
Conclusions:
- Allergic IH reactions constituted less than 10% of cutaneous reactions but over 50% of life-threatening reactions.
- ICM and GBCM induced comparable IH reactions in frequency and severity, with frequent cross-reactivity, particularly for GBCM.
- Skin testing with pure contrast agent is proposed as a more sensitive diagnostic method than the standard 1:10 dilution criterion.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
5-Number Summary
In a box plot, the minimum and maximum data values represent the lower and upper whiskers in the graph, and the median is designated as the center of the box in the chart. The first quartile and third...
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
Subviral Agents
Air-entraining Agents
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...

