Data on MECOM rearrangement-driven chromosomal aberrations in myeloid malignancies

Data in this article presents the results of conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses in 129 patients with confirmed MECOM rearrangement (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.03.002) [1]. Generally, the MECOM rearrangement has arisen through translocation, inversion, and insertion and/or unknown mechanism. In addition to the typical chromosomal aberrations, inv(3)(q21q26.2) and t(3; 3)(q21; q26.6) [2-4], over 50% of cases presented here exhibit a wide spectrum of MECOM rearrangement-driven, atypical chromosomal aberrations, including inv(3) with breakpoint other than 3q21; t(1; 3); t(2; 3); t(3; 6); t(3; 8); t(3; 12); t(3; 17); t(3; 21) as well as an insertion of 3q26.2 into different chromosomes. These cases are thoroughly characterized by karyotyping, interphase-, metaphase-, map-back FISH and whole chromosomal painting (WCP) analyses.