Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: May 23, 2011
Effect of electrode-electrolyte spatial mismatch on transcranial direct current stimulation: a finite element
Luyao Chen1, Xuecheng Zou1, Rongyu Tang2
1School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
Despite the encouraging pilot results of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) revealing its effectiveness in neuromodulation, there are also studies reporting inconsistent outcomes. Apart from previously studied factors, such as the differences in head model structures, anodal displacements, electrode shape and size, and connector position, the hypothesis that the inevitable spatial mismatch between the electrolyte buffer and electrode might shape current flow in the cerebral cortex was tested in this work, and our results potentially explain some of the reported inconsistent outcomes.
Approach:
A finite element head model was built using cylinder electrodes with an arbitrary diameter of 2 cm. Current flow induced by different spatial mismatch types, degrees, and directions was simulated for three montages targeting the left motor cortex. Voxel-level current density differences and Jaccard index values of different percentiles for each mismatched configuration were calculated and compared throughout the cerebral cortex to determine the effect of electrode-electrolyte geometric mismatch.
Main Results:
Spatial mismatch between the electrolyte buffer and electrode affected the current density distribution in the cerebral cortex to different extents, depending on the position of the return electrode and mismatch type, degree, and direction. Single cortical voxel current-density variance induced by the 50% excess or insufficient mismatch was as high as 14.44% or 38.04%, respectively. Moreover, the distribution of variance changed directionally with the mismatch orientation. Compared with the insufficient mismatch and single-directional mismatch, the excessive and symmetrical mismatch caused a less obvious effect on the current density distribution of tDCS. Specifically, the symmetrical excess electrolyte caused around 2%-4% current density changes for all the montages, with different degrees and directions of mismatch. When the target position was fixed at C3, maximum sensitivity to the electrolyte-electrode mismatch was achieved with Iz as the return electrode, compared with the other two choices. Further, more than 20% voxels with >90% percentile of the peak current density values would shift position if >30% insufficient geometric mismatch occurred for montage C3-Iz.
Significance:
Our findings suggest that special attention is required regarding the spatial matching of the electrolyte buffer to the electrode during tDCS to avoid unexpected large changes in current distribution.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Electrolyte and Nonelectrolyte Solutions
Electrolytes: van't Hoff Factor
The colligative properties of a solution depend only on the number, not on the identity, of solute species dissolved. The concentration terms in the equations for various colligative properties (freezing point depression, boiling point elevation, osmotic pressure) pertain to all solute species present in the solution. Nonelectrolytes dissolve physically without dissociation or any other accompanying process. Each molecule that dissolves yields one...
Elements and Compounds
Elements
Elements are classified as atomic or molecular based on the nature of their basic units. They are unique forms of matter with specific chemical and physical properties that cannot break down into smaller substances by ordinary chemical reactions. There...
Periodic Classification of the Elements

