Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Evaluating a novel free-breathing accelerated cardiac MRI cine sequence in patients with cardiomyopathy
Idan Roifman1, Jose Gutierrez2, Edison Wang2
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Introduction:
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the gold standard for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. However, traditional sequences are time-consuming and require breath-holding. Our aim was to evaluate the image quality of LV functional assessment with a novel, accelerated, free-breathing cine sequence and to compare LV functional parameters between it and a traditional sequence.
Methods:
This was a prospective cohort study of 31 patients with cardiomyopathy. All studies were performed on a 1.5 Tesla scanner. LV function was first determined using contiguous short axis slices covering the left ventricle from the base to the apex acquired with the standard cine sequence. Next, the accelerated sequence was acquired for each patient. The Wilcoxon Matched-Pair Sign Rank Test was used to compare image quality between the accelerated and traditional cine imaging sequences. Standard and accelerated left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were compared using linear regression. Bland-Altman plots were then constructed to evaluate agreement, interobserver and intraobserver variability for left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.
Results:
Mean acquisition time was 29 s for the accelerated sequence vs. 410 s for the traditional sequence. Qualitative assessment of image quality was similar for both sequences (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences in terms of LVEDV, LVESV, LVSV, LV mass and LVEF when calculated from either sequence with very good agreement between the standard and accelerated sequences. The mean differences with 95% limits of agreement were as follows: LV mass (-0.6, -22.9 g, 21.6 g), LVEDV (5.1 mL, -18.4 mL, 28.9 mL), LVEF (-0.3, -5.4, 4.7), LVESV (4.0 mL, -12.0 mL, 20.0 mL), LVSV (1.1 mL, -13.3 mL, 15.5 mL). Interobserver variability ranged from 0.1 to 6.3% while intraobserver variability ranged from 0.1 to 1.8%.
Conclusions:
The accelerated free-breathing cine sequence performed similarly to standard of care multi breath-hold cine imaging and was acquired in a fraction of the time without the need for breath-holding. If applied to clinical practice, this sequence can significantly reduce scanning time and facilitate CMR scanning in those patients who are unable to breath-hold.
More Related Videos
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
09:16Isolation and Characterization of Cardiac Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Endomyocardial Bioptic Samples of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Patients
Published on: February 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Breathing
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management