Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Talking about risk in the context of genomic tests (TARGET): development and evaluation of an educational program for
L Fallowfield1, I Solis-Trapala2, R Starkings3
1Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9RX, UK. l.j.fallowfield@sussex.ac.uk.
Purpose:
Gene expression profiling (GEP) test scores calculate risks of recurrence and likely benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer. As health literacy and numeracy skills in the general population are poor, healthcare professionals (HCPs) require a wide repertoire of communication skills to explain clearly risk of recurrence scores (RSs) and uncertainty. We developed and evaluated an educational program for HCPs discussing GEP test results and adjuvant treatment.
Methods:
Eight-hour workshops contained elements aimed at improving knowledge, communication skills and self-awareness; these included the science underpinning GEP tests, an interactive risk psychology lecture, exercises and facilitated group discussions regarding seven filmed scenarios involving discussions about high, intermediate and low RSs. Attendees were recorded explaining RSs with patient simulators pre and post workshop. Researchers, blinded to time point, analysed recordings using a study-specific scoring system. Primary objective outcomes were improvements post workshop in HCPs' competence and confidence when communicating 17 pre-specified key information areas. We estimated odds ratios (OR) using conditional logistic regression to compare pre- and post-workshop scores.
Results:
65 HCPs attended. Objective analyses revealed significant positive shifts post workshop which included explaining GEP tests (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.38-6.42; P = .001), recurrence RSs (OR 3.99; 95% CI 1.72-9.25; P < .001), benefits of chemotherapy (OR 3.99; 95% CI 1.82-8.75; P < .001; and harms OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.37-3.92; P < .001) using jargon free language (OR 5.29; 95% CI 2.27-12.35; P < .001). Patient simulator assessments also showed significant improvements as did HCPs' self-assessments and ratings of their self-confidence when discussing different GEP tests with diverse patient types (P < .001).
Conclusion:
These short, intensive, interactive TARGET workshops significantly improved HCPs' communication about GEP results in ways likely to promote more informed decision-making by patients about chemotherapy.
Related Concept Videos
Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context
Sleepwalking and Sleep Talking
Factors that increase the likelihood of sleepwalking include sleep deprivation and alcohol consumption. Contrary to common beliefs, it is safe...
Genomics
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Relative Risk
Impact of Social Context on Individuals

