Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Operative Complexity and Prior Endovascular Intervention Negatively Impact Morbidity after Aortobifemoral Bypass in
Charles DeCarlo1, Laura T Boitano1, Samuel I Schwartz1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Insights
Aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) has frequent major complications, with operative complexity and prior endovascular intervention being key predictors. Long-term survival after ABF depends on limb ischemia severity and patient comorbidities.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Endovascular Therapy
- Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
Background:
- Endovascular therapy is the primary treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease.
- This has shifted patient selection and risk profiles for aortobifemoral bypass (ABF).
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors influencing morbidity and mortality after ABF in the endovascular era.
- Identify predictors of major complications and long-term survival following ABF.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of primary ABF cases from 2000-2017.
- Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models for endpoint prediction.
- Kaplan-Meier analysis for patency, reintervention, and survival rates.
Main Results:
- 256 patients underwent primary ABF; 30-day mortality was 2.7%, with 35.9% experiencing major complications.
- Predictors of major complications included prior endovascular intervention, malignancy, intraoperative issues, and blood loss.
- Predictors of late mortality included malignancy, COPD, CHF, Rutherford class, blood loss, and CKD.
Conclusions:
- Major complications after ABF are common, influenced by operative complexity and prior endovascular procedures.
- Long-term survival is significantly impacted by the severity of limb ischemia and patient comorbidities.
- Careful patient selection and potential modifications to the ABF approach are recommended to improve outcomes.
Background:
Endovascular therapy is first-line treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease. This shift has altered case volume, patient selection, and risk profile for aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). Given this, we sought to investigate factors influencing morbidity and mortality after ABF in the endovascular era.
Methods:
Data for patients undergoing primary ABF from 2000 to 2017 were queried. Primary endpoints included major complication (unplanned return to the operating room, life-or-limb-threatening complications, and 30-day readmission or death) and long-term survival. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models determined predictors of primary endpoints. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated patency, freedom from reintervention, and long-term survival.
Results:
During these 17 years, 256 patients underwent primary ABF. Mean age was 67.9 ± 10.6 years and 51.2% were women. Most had claudication (69.5%); 28.9% had critical ischemia. Sixty-five (25.4%) patients had prior aortoiliac endovascular intervention, 106 (41.4%) required aortic cuff endarterectomy, 111 (43.3%) femoral outflow adjunct, 9 (3.5%) simultaneous lower extremity bypass, and 230 (89.8%) had Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions. Concomitant renovisceral revascularization was needed in 42 (16.4%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was 2.7%. Major complication occurred in 92 patients (35.9%). Predictors included prior endovascular intervention (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-4.1; P = 0.01), malignancy (OR, 2.6; 95% CI: 1.3-5.3; P = 0.01), intraoperative complication (OR, 3.3; 95% CI: 1.3-9.2; P = 0.03), operative blood loss, (OR, 1.0 per 100 ml; 95% CI: 1.0-1.0; P = 0.03), and cuff endarterectomy (OR, 1.8; 95% CI: 1.0-3.1; P = 0.04). Median follow-up was 5.3 years (interquartile range: 7.2 years). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94%, 90%, and 82% respectively. Primary patency and freedom from reintervention at 5 years were 76% and 79%, respectively. Predictors of late mortality included malignancy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3-3.9; P < 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.1; P = 0.02), congestive heart failure (HR, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.3; P = 0.01), Rutherford's class (HR, 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1; P = 0.01), operative blood loss (HR 1.0 per 100 ml; 95% CI: 1.0-1.0; P = 0.04) and chronic kidney disease (HR, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.2; P = 0.01).
Conclusions:
Although late outcomes after ABF in the contemporary era remain acceptable, major complications are frequent. Operative complexity and prior endovascular revascularization predict complications. Long-term survival is driven by degree of limb ischemia and comorbidities. These should be considered in selection for ABF, potentially modifying approach to improve outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Negative Regulator Molecules
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Impact of Groups on Groups

