Congenital Anomalies in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review

Shona Goldsmith1, Sarah McIntyre1, Michele Hansen2

  • 11 Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Insights

Congenital anomalies are common in children with cerebral palsy (CP), especially those born at term. Further research is needed to understand these links and explore prevention strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Congenital anomalies are recognized as significant risk factors for cerebral palsy (CP), particularly in term infants.
  • Existing research highlights a notable prevalence of congenital anomalies among individuals with CP, yet gaps in understanding persist.
  • Variability in study methodologies, including cohort criteria and anomaly classification, complicates direct comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and synthesize evidence on the association between congenital anomalies and cerebral palsy (CP).
  • To identify common types of congenital anomalies in children with CP.
  • To investigate differences in anomaly prevalence between term and preterm infants with CP.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of eight population-based studies.
  • Inclusion of studies with a total of 10,081 participants.
  • Analysis of reported congenital anomalies in children with pre/perinatal and postneonatal brain injury.

Main Results:

  • Congenital anomalies were present in 12%–32% of children with pre/perinatal brain injury and 20% with postneonatal brain injury.
  • Microcephaly and hydrocephaly were the most frequent cerebral anomalies; circulatory system anomalies were most common non-cerebral.
  • A higher proportion of congenital anomalies was observed in term infants compared to preterm infants with CP.

Conclusions:

  • Congenital anomalies are frequently observed in individuals diagnosed with cerebral palsy.
  • Collaborative research is essential to address study variations and elucidate specific pathways linking congenital anomalies to CP.
  • Understanding these associations may reveal opportunities for targeted prevention strategies.

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.6K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
12.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K