Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Evaluating the Adoption of Laboratory Practice Guidelines
Jeffrey D Goldsmith1, Patrick L Fitzgibbons1, Lisa A Fatheree1
1From the Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Goldsmith); the Department of Pathology, St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California (Dr Fitzgibbons); Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-Based Guidelines (Ms Fatheree) and Statistics/Biostatistics (Ms Souers), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; Division of Laboratory Systems, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Astles); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Department of Pathology, Rex Pathology Associates, Raleigh, North Carolina (Dr Volmar); and the Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville (Dr Nakhleh).
Context.—:
To date, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) has developed 17 laboratory practice guidelines (LPGs) including updates. In 2013, the CAP was awarded a 5-year cooperative agreement grant from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to increase the effectiveness of LPGs.
Objective.—:
To assess the awareness and adoption of 2 CAP LPGs: immunohistochemical (IHC) assay validation and initial workup of acute leukemia.
Design.—:
Baseline surveys for each LPG were conducted in 2010 and 2015, respectively. To measure the adoption of guideline recommendations and inform future updates, a follow-up study consisting of surveys, telephone interviews, and focus group sessions was conducted in laboratories that indicated they perform IHC testing. A follow-up study for the acute leukemia LPG is planned.
Results.—:
For the IHC Validation LPG, a total of 1624 survey responses, 40 telephone interviews, and discussions with 5 focus group participants were analyzed. The response rate for the aforementioned 3 modalities was 46%, 13%, and 3%, respectively. All modalities indicated most respondents were aware of the LPG and had adopted most or all of its recommendations. Respondents expressed needs for continued communication, increased specificity, and more prescriptive recommendations when the guideline is updated.
Conclusions.—:
While data-driven development of evidence-based LPGs requires significant resources, active data collection to identify gaps and assess adoption contributes to improved laboratory testing practices in support of patient care. The CAP identified sustainable modalities to track metrics and developed multiple tools that should improve guideline development, adoption, and implementation. Of these modalities, written or electronic surveys were the most logistically feasible and had the highest response rate.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.

