Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Bioanalytical LC-MS/MS validation of therapeutic drug monitoring assays in oncology
Merel van Nuland1,2, Hilde Rosing1, Jan H M Schellens3
1Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has shown to benefit patients treated with drugs of many drug classes, among which is oncology. With an increasing demand for drug monitoring, new assays have to be developed and validated. Guidelines for bioanalytical validation issued by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration are applicable for clinical trials and toxicokinetic studies and demand fully validated bioanalytical methods to yield reliable results. However, for TDM assays a limited validation approach is suggested based on the intended use of these methods. This review presents an overview of publications that describe method validation of assays specifically designed for TDM. In addition to evaluating current practice, we provide recommendations that could serve as a guide for future validations of TDM assays.
Insights
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assays require specific validation approaches. This review examines current practices and offers recommendations for future TDM assay validation to ensure reliable patient results.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Pharmacology
- Bioanalytical Science
Background:
- Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is crucial for optimizing drug efficacy and safety across various therapeutic areas, including oncology.
- The increasing demand for TDM necessitates the development and validation of new analytical assays.
- Existing bioanalytical validation guidelines (e.g., FDA, EMA) are stringent but may not be fully applicable to TDM assays due to their intended use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and evaluate current practices in the method validation of assays specifically designed for TDM.
- To provide recommendations for future validation strategies of TDM assays.
- To ensure the reliability and accuracy of TDM results for clinical decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of publications detailing method validation for TDM assays.
- Analysis of validation approaches described in the reviewed literature.
- Comparison of current TDM assay validation practices against established bioanalytical guidelines.
Main Results:
- A significant variation in validation approaches for TDM assays was observed across studies.
- Many TDM assays are validated using limited approaches, often tailored to their specific clinical application.
- Current practices sometimes deviate from, or do not fully implement, standard bioanalytical validation requirements.
Conclusions:
- A tailored, risk-based validation strategy is appropriate for TDM assays, considering their intended use.
- Clearer guidelines or recommendations are needed to standardize TDM assay validation.
- Implementing robust yet appropriate validation ensures the clinical utility and reliability of TDM.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Antipsychotic Drugs: Therapeutic Uses and Side Effects
Despite these side effects, antipsychotics are used therapeutically for various purposes, including managing schizophrenia, preventing nausea and vomiting, curbing...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications

