Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Treatment Protocol for Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis Using a Single-Crystal Piezoelectric Focused Shock Wave Source
Published on: December 23, 2022
Accuracy of shoulder ultrasound examination for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathologies: a single-center retrospective
Rafat Saeed Mohtasib1, Abeer Mohd Alzahrani1, Yasser Nasser Asiri1
1From the Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Background:
Shoulder pathologies need accurate diagnosis for best management and treatment provided to patients.
Objective:
Determine the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of shoulder ultrasonography (US).
Design:
Retrospective, analytical.
Setting:
Tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Patients And Methods:
We included all shoulder exams performed between January 2010 and December 2016 that met the inclusion criteria. Data was collected retrospectively from the a picture archiving and communication system and patient records. The patients were evaluated using US for the presence of rotator cuff tears and classified into intact, full-thickness tear, partial-thickness tear, tendinosis, subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis and acromioclavicular joint degenerative changes. The US findings were correlated with the shoulder MRI study findings. The time interval between the US examination and MRI ranged from 0 to 180 days (6 months).
Main Outcome Measures:
To compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of shoulder US studies in the detection of rotator cuff pathologies in comparison to MRI findings.
Sample Size And Characteristics:
86 (60 females, 26 male), mean age 53.7 years (range, 19-85).
Results:
The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US for the detection of full-thickness supraspinatus tears compared with those of MRI were 86%, 82% and 83%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US for the detection of partial-thickness supraspinatus tears compared with those of MRI were 38%, 70% and 58%, respectively. Overall PPV, NPV, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US for the detection of full-thickness tears compared with those of MRI were 35%, 97%, 78%, 83% and 83%, respectively. For partial-thickness tears, the overall PPV, NPV, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US compared with those of MRI were 51%, 60%, 51%, 60% and 56%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Overall, US has high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of full-thickness tears compared with the detection of partial-thickness tears.
Limitations:
Small sample size and retrospective.
Conflict Of Interest:
None.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Muscles of the Shoulder
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Accuracy and Precision
Center of Gravity

