Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Artificial intelligence--its use in nephrology.

P Degoulet1

  • 1Service d'Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France.

Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation : Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Virtuous Circles of Clinical Information Systems: a Modern Utopia.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Multimedia Workstations: Electronic Assistants for Health-Care Professionals.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Graduate Programs in Medical Informatics at the Patis Universities.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Validity of a clinical decision rule-based alert system for drug dose adjustment in patients with renal failure intended to improve pharmacists' analysis of medication orders in hospitals.

International journal of medical informatics·2013
Same author

A business rules design framework for a pharmaceutical validation and alert system.

Methods of information in medicine·2010
Same author

Electronic Healthcare Record and clinical research in cardiovascular radiology. HL7 CDA and CDISC ODM interoperability.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2008
Same journal

Urinary protein vs albumin for assessing kidney failure risk in chronic kidney disease.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
Same journal

Systolic blood pressure and albuminuria reduction mediate cardiovascular benefits of finerenone in T2 diabetes and CKD.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
Same journal

Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone versus Rituximab in PGNMID.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
Same journal

Prevalence of anti-rituximab antibodies in autoimmune forms of glomerulonephritis and podocytopathies.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
Same journal

Pathophysiology of pregnancy-associated acute kidney injury.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
Same journal

Risk of CKD in biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2026
See all related articles

This article examines the practical integration of computer-based expert systems into kidney care. While early predictions for these technologies were overly optimistic, the authors provide a realistic assessment of their current capabilities. The paper explores how clinicians and software developers can collaborate to improve patient data management. By combining existing medical databases with intelligent software, the authors suggest that healthcare providers can create more effective tools for decision support. The discussion highlights both the potential benefits and the inherent limitations of these systems in a hospital setting. Ultimately, the work emphasizes that human expertise remains a necessary component of successful digital health implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Artificial intelligence applications in clinical medicine
  • Nephrology research and diagnostic systems development

Background:

No prior work has fully reconciled the gap between early, ambitious visions of automated medical diagnosis and the current, more measured reality of clinical software. Decades ago, researchers anticipated that machine logic would rapidly replace human decision-making in complex fields. That uncertainty drove a need to re-evaluate these tools within specific medical specialties. While software development has advanced, the transition from experimental laboratory settings to routine hospital use remains incomplete. This paper addresses the discrepancy between past hype and present functional utility. Scholars have long debated how to best bridge the divide between computer science and patient care. The field requires a sober assessment of what these programs can actually achieve for practitioners. Understanding this historical context helps clarify why many initial goals for automated systems were not met.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this paper is to provide a balanced and realistic assessment of how intelligent software is currently utilized within the field of kidney medicine. The authors seek to address the gap between the overly optimistic predictions of the past and the practical reality of modern clinical tools. They examine the specific justifications and indications for implementing expert systems in hospital settings. The study explores the necessary collaboration between medical specialists and software developers to ensure effective system design. By evaluating the role of patient database management, the researchers aim to identify how to build more robust expert database systems. The paper addresses the limitations that hinder the widespread adoption of these technologies in daily practice. The authors intend to clarify the roles of different stakeholders in the development process. This work serves to ground expectations by focusing on the functional goals of current computational approaches.

Keywords:
expert systemsclinical decision supportdigital healthmedical informatics

Frequently Asked Questions

The authors propose that these systems function by integrating intelligent software with existing patient database management tools. This combination creates expert database systems, which aim to support clinical decision-making rather than acting as autonomous diagnostic agents.

Knowledge engineers are responsible for the technical development and maintenance of the software, while medical experts provide the clinical domain knowledge. The researchers suggest that this partnership is necessary to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the output.

A clinical database is necessary because it provides the structured information required for the software to generate meaningful insights. Without this foundation, the researchers argue that the technology lacks the context needed to assist in complex medical scenarios.

The researchers evaluate the role of data management systems as the primary infrastructure for housing and processing clinical information. This component acts as the backbone, allowing the software to access and interpret patient records effectively.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a critical examination of existing expert systems currently utilized within the field of kidney medicine. The authors investigate the justification and clinical indications for deploying these digital tools. They analyze the collaborative relationship between software designers and medical practitioners to understand how knowledge is transferred. The study evaluates the technical requirements for merging intelligent algorithms with standard hospital record-keeping platforms. By reviewing historical examples, the authors assess the gap between early theoretical promises and actual performance. The methodology focuses on identifying the limitations that prevent widespread adoption in clinical practice. The authors synthesize evidence regarding the design of systems that can effectively manage complex patient information. This review provides a framework for understanding the practical application of computational logic in a medical environment.

Main Results:

The strongest finding from the literature indicates that early, high-level expectations for automated diagnostic tools have shifted toward a more realistic, sober assessment of their current capabilities. The authors report that these systems are successfully moving from isolated research environments into broader clinical domains. They identify that the primary utility of these tools lies in their ability to support, rather than replace, human expertise. The review shows that the integration of software into patient database management systems is a critical step for future development. The authors find that the collaboration between technical engineers and medical specialists is a defining factor in system success. They observe that current limitations often stem from a failure to align software goals with actual clinical needs. The evidence suggests that expert database systems offer a more practical solution than standalone diagnostic programs. The authors demonstrate that the transition to routine use is a gradual process influenced by both technical and human factors.

Conclusions:

The authors synthesize the current state of expert systems to provide a balanced perspective on their utility in kidney medicine. They suggest that the integration of software into existing patient databases represents a viable path forward. This synthesis implies that the role of the human expert remains central to the success of any diagnostic tool. The authors argue that developers must acknowledge the inherent limitations of current technology to avoid repeating past errors. Their review indicates that successful implementation depends on the collaboration between clinicians and software engineers. The implications of this work highlight the necessity of building expert database systems rather than standalone programs. The authors conclude that these tools should support, rather than replace, the judgment of medical professionals. This perspective serves as a guide for future efforts to improve digital infrastructure in healthcare environments.

The researchers measure the success of these systems by comparing their current performance against the ambitious expectations set during the seventies. They observe that the technology has transitioned from speculative research to a more sober, practical reality.

The authors imply that the future of this technology lies in the creation of collaborative expert database systems. They suggest that this approach will improve clinical outcomes by combining human judgment with digital efficiency.