Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a
C Quiles1, A Prouteau2, H Verdoux1
1Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; INSERM, U1219, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Centre hospitalier Charles-Perrens, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Metacognitive awareness assessments during ("on line") and after ("end line") cognitive tasks yielded different results for memory versus social cognition. "On line" and "end line" metacognition may be distinct, especially in schizophrenia.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuropsychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Metacognition, or awareness of one's own cognition, is crucial for effective cognitive functioning.
- Assessing metacognition can be done during task performance ('on line') or after ('end line'), but their comparability is not well understood.
- Understanding metacognitive awareness is particularly relevant for conditions like schizophrenia, which involve cognitive deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether metacognitive awareness assessments ('on line' vs. 'end line') yield comparable results for basic and high-level cognitive functions.
- To explore the relationship between 'on line' and 'end line' metacognitive awareness in memory and social cognition tasks.
- To inform potential assessment strategies for metacognition in clinical populations, such as individuals with schizophrenia.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed short-term and working memory tests (digit recall) and a social cognition test (Faces Test).
- 'On line' metacognitive awareness was measured by confidence ratings after each response.
- 'End line' metacognitive awareness was assessed by overall confidence and feeling of success ratings after the entire test.
Main Results:
- No significant association was found between 'on line' and 'end line' metacognitive awareness scores for memory tests.
- A significant association was observed for the social cognition test, where poor 'end line' awareness correlated with lower 'on line' awareness.
- These findings suggest that 'on line' and 'end line' metacognition may represent distinct constructs.
Conclusions:
- Metacognitive awareness assessments ('on line' and 'end line') are not interchangeable across different cognitive domains.
- The multi-faceted nature of metacognition warrants the assessment of both 'on line' and 'end line' components, particularly in clinical contexts like schizophrenia.
- Future research should consider the differential assessment of metacognitive awareness to better understand cognitive functioning and deficits.
More Related Videos
10:58Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
Published on: August 28, 2021
10:09Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
Published on: September 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Organization
Molecules Are Composed of Atoms, and Biomolecules Are Assembled from Molecules:
The most basic levels include atoms, molecules, and biomolecules. Atoms, the smallest unit of ordinary matter, are composed of a nucleus and electrons. Molecules...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Leveling Effect
Fermi Level
At absolute zero temperature, electrons fill all energy states up to the Fermi level, leaving upper states empty. As the temperature rises,...
Trophic Levels
Leveling Equipment