E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear staining dictates adverse disease outcome in lobular breast cancer patients
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

High-Throughput Dissociation and Orthotopic Implantation of Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: December 20, 2024
João Lobo1,2,3, Sara Petronilho1,2,3, Amy Hanlon Newell4
1Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract:
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and additional biomarkers for individually predicting patient outcomes are needed. Aberrant membrane E-cadherin immunoexpression has been demonstrated in lobular breast cancer. Also, E-cadherin nuclear staining has been reported, associating with prognosis in various tumors. Here, we explore whether membrane or nuclear staining of E-cadherin has the potential to dictate prognosis of patients with lobular breast cancer. We selected a cohort of 285 consecutively diagnosed lobular breast cancer patients and performed immunohistochemistry for E-cadherin (clones 36, EP700Y, and NCH38) and P-cadherin (clone 56C1) in representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. All patients were female, HER2-negative and surgically treated in a single institution. Survival curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios and respective 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox regression models. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Nuclear staining for E-cadherin clone 36 was frequent (35%), contrarily to other antibodies tested. Negative correlation was found between nuclear and membrane E-cadherin clone 36 immunostaining (rs = -0.30, p < 0.001), whereas positive correlation was found between membrane immunoexpression of E-cadherin clone 36 and P-cadherin (rs = 0.31, p < 0.001). Patients with any evidence of E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear immunostaining disclosed significantly worse overall survival, disease-specific-survival and disease/progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.059, 95% confidence interval 1.313-3.230; hazard ratio = 1.980, 95% confidence interval 1.121-3.495; and hazard ratio = 2.341, 95% confidence interval 1.403-3.905, respectively). Differences in survival were more remarkable when considering nuclear E-cadherin immunoexpression in ≥50% tumor cells. Poorer survival was maintained in multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, menopausal and PR status, treatment course, vascular invasion, tumor grade and stage. Our results support the use of antibodies against the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin, such as clone 36, which may reveal nuclear immunostaining and indicate more aggressive clinical course in patients with lobular breast cancer. We hypothesize that E-cadherin is cleaved and translocated to nucleus functioning as transcription factor.
Related Concept Videos
Reproductive Cloning
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
In SCNT, an egg cell is taken from an animal and its nucleus is removed, creating an enucleated egg. Then a somatic...
Structure of Cadherins
Cadherins in Tissue Organization
Cell Sorting During Development
Cell sorting plays an...
Atomic Radii and Effective Nuclear Charge
Nuclear Stability
To hold positively charged protons together...
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...

