Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Modeling Ascending Vaginal Infection, Preterm Birth, and Neonatal Morbidity in Mice
Published on: October 10, 2025
The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth
Dane A De Silva1, Marie E Thoma1
1Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Background:
Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events.
Objective:
To examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and severe maternal morbidity using near-national birth certificate data and account for known under-reporting using probabilistic bias analysis.
Methods:
We used revised 2014-2017 birth certificate data, restricting to resident women with a non-first-born singleton birth. We examined the following: (a) maternal blood transfusion, (b) admission to intensive care unit (ICU), (c) uterine rupture (among women with a prior caesarean delivery) and (d) third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (among vaginal deliveries) by IPI categories (<6, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, 24-59 and 60+ months). Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log-binomial regression, adjusting for select maternal characteristics. Probabilistic bias analyses were performed.
Results:
Compared with IPI 18 to 23 months, adjusted models revealed that the risk of maternal transfusion followed a U-shaped curve with IPI, while risk of ICU admission and perineal laceration increased with longer IPI. Risk of uterine rupture was highest among IPI <6 months. With the exception of maternal transfusion, these findings persisted regardless of the extent or type of misclassification examined in bias analyses.
Conclusions:
Associations between IPI and maternal morbidity varied by outcome, even after adjusting for misclassification of SMM. Differences across maternal health outcomes should be considered when counselling and making recommendations regarding optimal birth spacing.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
11:44Real-Time DC-dynamic Biasing Method for Switching Time Improvement in Severely Underdamped Fringing-field Electrostatic MEMS Actuators
Published on: August 15, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Birth Control Methods
National Nursing Organizations I
Hindsight Biases
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.