Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

56.7K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
56.7K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.0K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
2.0K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.5K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.5K
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

1.8K
Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
1.8K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.4K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.4K
Formats for Nursing Documentation01:28

Formats for Nursing Documentation

1.9K
Nursing documentation encompasses various formats designed to capture precise patient data, facilitate communication among healthcare team members, and ensure comprehensive and accurate patient records. Let's explore each of these formats in detail:
Nursing Assessment Form:
• A nursing assessment form is a foundational document that captures detailed patient data from physical assessments and nursing histories.
• It includes patient demographics, medical history,...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Integrated multi-omics and machine learning identify OGDHL as a key regulator of glioblastoma progression and antitumor immunity via glutamine metabolism and histone lactylation.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

A predictive model for early neurological deterioration in medullary infarction based on explainable machine learning.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for patients undergoing minimally invasive vertebroplasty: effects on pain and lumbar function.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Recurrence associated IGFBP2 promotes malignant progression and epithelial mesenchymal transition in glioma cells via the AKT mTOR pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Decreased miR-1305 expression is associated with tumour invasiveness and poor prognosis in glioma patients.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Astaxanthin alleviates ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
09:00

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Published on: April 15, 2015

12.8K

Spatial hearing processing: electrophysiological documentation at subcortical and cortical levels.

Nematollah Rouhbakhsh1,2,3,4, John Mahdi5, Jacob Hwo6

  • 1HEARing Cooperation Research Centre , Melbourne , Australia.

The International Journal of Neuroscience
|June 25, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Spatial release from masking (SRM) can be objectively measured in the brainstem and cortex. This suggests the auditory system suppresses noise using spatial cues, starting in the brainstem, especially in challenging listening conditions.

Keywords:
Spatial release from maskingauditory brainstem responsecortical auditory evoked potentialfrequency-following responsesignal-to-noise ratiospatial processing

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

771
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
09:00

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Published on: April 15, 2015

12.8K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

771
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Neurophysiology
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Spatial release from masking (SRM) enhances target recognition via source separation.
  • Neural mechanisms of SRM are not fully understood.
  • Identifying objective neural correlates of SRM is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if objective correlates of SRM can be recorded in the brainstem and/or cortex.
  • To investigate the neural basis of spatial auditory perception.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), frequency-following responses (FFRs), and cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) concurrently.
  • Used flat and staircase stimulus patterns with randomized distractors at various SNRs (-5 to 15 dB).
  • Tested co-located and spatially separated sound source conditions in 13 normally hearing adults.

Main Results:

  • FFR F0 amplitude increased for flat stimuli at -5 dB SNR.
  • ABR wave V latency decreased for both stimulus types across all SNRs.
  • CAEP P1 and N1 latencies require further investigation due to noise.

Conclusions:

  • SRM can be objectively recorded simultaneously in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
  • The central auditory system may suppress noise using spatial information originating in the brainstem.
  • This electrophysiological approach may enable future evaluation of spatial processing.