Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Myocardial viability: heart failure perspective
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Insights
Assessing myocardial viability with cardiac imaging is crucial for heart failure patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) are preferred for guiding revascularization decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure necessitate evaluating myocardial viability.
- Revascularization strategies depend on the presence of viable myocardium.
- Accurate viability assessment guides treatment decisions and improves patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and highlight various imaging modalities for assessing myocardial viability.
- To discuss the role of imaging in guiding revascularization for patients with heart failure and CAD.
- To compare the effectiveness of different imaging techniques in predicting outcomes post-revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on cardiac imaging techniques for myocardial viability.
- Analysis of studies utilizing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET).
- Examination of clinical trial data, including the PARR-2 trial, on the impact of viability testing on patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) are effective in assessing myocardial viability.
- Patients with residual viable myocardium after revascularization show increased mortality.
- PET-guided viability assessment in the PARR-2 trial correlated with improved outcomes, reducing cardiac events.
Conclusions:
- Viability testing is recommended for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and suitable for revascularization.
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) offer superior resolution and sensitivity for viability assessment.
- Utilizing advanced imaging modalities like CMR and PET can optimize revascularization strategies and improve patient prognosis.
Purpose Of Review:
This review highlights the different imaging modalities available to assess myocardial viability in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease (CAD) being considered for revascularization.
Recent Findings:
Myocardial viability can be determined by a variety of cardiac imaging modalities. Recent studies have confirmed the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with heart failure and CAD, suggesting that those who undergo revascularization but have evidence of residual viable or 'jeopardized' myocardium have increased mortality compared with those who achieve complete revascularization. The PET and Recovery Following Revascularization (PARR)-2 trial assessed whether viability noted on PET imaging in patients with severe LV dysfunction correlated with recovery of LV function and response to revascularization. The 5-year extension of the PARR-2 study noted a significant decrease in the composite outcome of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or cardiac hospitalization in patient assessments adherent to PET-guided viability recommendations.
Summary:
On the basis of the current available data, viability testing is reasonable in individuals with ICM, as identified by coronary angiography in whom complete revascularization can be achieved. Whenever available, the use of CMR or PET is preferred because of better resolution and increased sensitivity to detect myocardial viability.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

