Plain radiographs for the assessment of coronectomy: not always a case of black or white

In recent years, coronectomy of impacted lower third molar teeth has become an increasingly popular alternative to removal. Traditionally, orthopantomograms of mandibular third molars have been used to indicate features that show that the tooth is in close proximity to, or in an intimate relation with, the inferior dental nerve. Some authors advocate coronectomy as opposed to surgical removal to reduce the risk of damage to the nerve. In our Trust during the last two years, there has been a noticeable increase in the prescription of coronectomy for the management of pericoronitis associated with mandibular third molars. The purpose of this study therefore was to examine the differences among clinicians in their assessment of the need for coronectomy using plain-view radiographs. An online survey was completed by 25 clinicians with different levels of experience from six units across the UK and Republic of Ireland. We found a wide variation in the number of coronectomies prescribed (intraclass correlation 2.67), and when prescribed, a lack of agreement about the radiographic feature that had influenced the decision. These judgments are not straightforward. They are, to some extent, subjective, and in certain cases may benefit from a team-led approach.