Related Experiment Videos
The FDA Advisory Panel's decision on rt-PA
1Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
|October 1, 1987
Summary
The FDA delayed approval for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) due to insufficient data on its effectiveness and safety for heart attack treatment. Concerns also exist regarding bleeding, rethrombosis, and cost compared to streptokinase.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is a thrombolytic agent.
- Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) treatment is a critical area of medical research.
- The FDA's Cardio-renal Advisory Panel reviewed rt-PA for heart attack treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address dissatisfaction with the FDA panel's recommendation to delay rt-PA approval.
- To evaluate the clinical benefit and safety data for rt-PA in treating acute myocardial infarction.
- To compare rt-PA with streptokinase regarding efficacy, safety, and cost.
Main Methods:
- Review of data submitted to the FDA regarding rt-PA's molecular form, dosage, and duration of therapy.
- Analysis of comparative claims between rt-PA and streptokinase.
- Consideration of rt-PA's association with rethrombosis and cost.
Main Results:
- The FDA panel recommended delaying rt-PA approval due to inadequate data.
- Questions exist regarding rt-PA's claimed safety (bleeding) and efficacy compared to streptokinase.
- rt-PA use is associated with higher rethrombosis rates and significantly greater cost.
Conclusions:
- Further data is required to establish the clinical benefit and safety of specific rt-PA regimens.
- The comparative advantages of rt-PA over streptokinase require further investigation.
- Cost-effectiveness and rethrombosis risks are important considerations for rt-PA adoption.