Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes
Published on: March 3, 2015
Identifying Compounds with Genotoxicity Potential Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays
Jui-Hua Hsieh1, Stephanie L Smith-Roe2, Ruili Huang3
1Kelly Government Solutions , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States.
Abstract:
Genotoxicity is a critical component of a comprehensive toxicological profile. The Tox21 Program used five quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays measuring some aspect of DNA damage/repair to provide information on the genotoxic potential of over 10 000 compounds. Included were assays detecting activation of p53, increases in the DNA repair protein ATAD5, phosphorylation of H2AX, and enhanced cytotoxicity in DT40 cells deficient in DNA-repair proteins REV3 or KU70/RAD54. Each assay measures a distinct component of the DNA damage response signaling network; >70% of active compounds were detected in only one of the five assays. When qHTS results were compared with results from three standard genotoxicity assays (bacterial mutation, in vitro chromosomal aberration, and in vivo micronucleus), a maximum of 40% of known, direct-acting genotoxicants were active in one or more of the qHTS genotoxicity assays, indicating low sensitivity. This suggests that these qHTS assays cannot in their current form be used to replace traditional genotoxicity assays. However, despite the low sensitivity, ranking chemicals by potency of response in the qHTS assays revealed an enrichment for genotoxicants up to 12-fold compared with random selection, when allowing a 1% false positive rate. This finding indicates these qHTS assays can be used to prioritize chemicals for further investigation, allowing resources to focus on compounds most likely to induce genotoxic effects. To refine this prioritization process, models for predicting the genotoxicity potential of chemicals that were active in Tox21 genotoxicity assays were constructed using all Tox21 assay data, yielding a prediction accuracy up to 0.83. Data from qHTS assays related to stress-response pathway signaling (including genotoxicity) were the most informative for model construction. By using the results from qHTS genotoxicity assays, predictions from models based on qHTS data, and predictions from commercial bacterial mutagenicity QSAR models, we prioritized Tox21 chemicals for genotoxicity characterization.
Insights
Quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays can prioritize chemicals for genotoxicity testing, despite low sensitivity. These assays, measuring DNA damage response, enrich for genotoxicants, aiding resource allocation for toxicological profiling.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Genetics
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Genotoxicity assessment is crucial for toxicological profiling.
- The Tox21 Program evaluated over 10,000 compounds using high-throughput screening (HTS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utility of five quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for genotoxicity evaluation.
- To compare qHTS results with standard genotoxicity assays.
- To develop predictive models for genotoxicity.
Main Methods:
- Utilized five qHTS assays measuring DNA damage/repair indicators (p53 activation, ATAD5, H2AX phosphorylation, DT40 cell cytotoxicity).
- Compared qHTS data with bacterial mutation, in vitro chromosomal aberration, and in vivo micronucleus assays.
- Developed predictive models using Tox21 assay data and QSAR models.
Main Results:
- Each qHTS assay detected distinct DNA damage response components; >70% of active compounds were assay-specific.
- qHTS assays showed low sensitivity (max 40% detection of known genotoxicants) compared to standard assays.
- Ranking by qHTS potency enriched for genotoxicants up to 12-fold, enabling prioritization.
- Predictive models achieved up to 0.83 accuracy, with stress-response pathway data being most informative.
Conclusions:
- Current qHTS genotoxicity assays cannot replace traditional methods due to low sensitivity.
- qHTS assays are valuable for prioritizing chemicals for further genotoxicity investigation.
- Integrated qHTS data, predictive models, and QSAR improved chemical prioritization for genotoxicity characterization.
Related Concept Videos
Molecules and Compounds
Potential Energy
Chemical bonds that form attractive forces between atoms also contain potential energy, called chemical energy. When a chemical reaction...
Classification of Elements and Compounds
Compounds are pure substances composed of two or more elements in fixed, definite proportions. Compounds are classified as ionic or molecular (covalent) based on the bonds...
Organic Compounds
Elements and Compounds
Elements
Elements are classified as atomic or molecular based on the nature of their basic units. They are unique forms of matter with specific chemical and physical properties that cannot break down into smaller substances by ordinary chemical reactions. There...
Solubility of Ionic Compounds

