Analysis of Intrasession Repeatability of Ocular Aberrometric Measurements and Validation of Keratometry Provided by a New Integrated System in Mild to Moderate Keratoconus
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Traumatic Brain Injury Research - A Closed-Head Model for Accurate Replication and Rapid Assessment
Published on: September 22, 2023
David P Piñero1,2, Roberto Soto-Negro2, Pedro Ruiz-Fortes2
1Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Purpose:
To evaluate the intrasession repeatability and validity of corneal curvature measurements provided by a new multifunctional device and to assess the intrasession repeatability of its ocular aberrometric measures.
Methods:
This prospective study comprises 37 mild to moderate keratoconus eyes of 37 patients. In all cases, 3 repeated measures of corneal topography and ocular aberrometry were performed with the iDesign 2 system (iD2; Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc, Jacksonville, FL) and one keratometric measurement was performed with the intraocular lens-(IOL) Master 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) and Sirius (CSO) (SIR) systems.
Results:
The within-subject SD (Sw) was <0.50 D for all iD2 keratometric measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.980. Sw and ICC for the keratometric axis were 2.60 degrees and 0.992, respectively. Concerning aberrations, all Sw values for high-order Zernike terms were ≤0.11 μm (ICC > 0.900), and all Sw values for refraction data were <0.75 D (ICC > 0.95), except for J45. No statistically significant differences were found between the devices in any keratometric parameter evaluated (P ≥ 0.222), but the limits of agreement between the devices were clinically relevant. The magnitude of K readings and astigmatism correlated significantly with the difference in these parameters between iD2 and SIR (0.432 ≤ r ≤ 0.489, P ≤ 0.041).
Conclusions:
The iD2 system provides consistent measures of keratometry and ocular aberrometry in eyes with mild to moderate keratoconus. Keratometric data obtained with this system in these eyes cannot be considered as interchangeable with data provided by intraocular lens-Master 500 and SIR.
More Related Videos
05:15Isolation of Intact Eyeball to Obtain Integral Ocular Surface Tissue for Histological Examination and Immunohistochemistry
Published on: October 20, 2019
10:51Fabrication and Validation of an Organ-on-chip System with Integrated Electrodes to Directly Quantify Transendothelial Electrical Resistance
Published on: September 26, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
The Integrated Rate Law: The Dependence of Concentration on Time
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...