Early total enteral feeding in stable preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Belal Alshaikh1, Dinesh Dharel1, Kamran Yusuf1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Insights

Early total enteral feeding (ETEF) is safe and feasible for stable preterm infants weighing over 1000-1200g. This approach may reduce late-onset sepsis and hospital stay, but further research is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Nutrition

Background:

  • Early initiation of enteral nutrition is crucial for preterm infant development.
  • Current feeding guidelines often involve slow advancement, potentially delaying benefits.
  • The safety and efficacy of early total enteral feeding (ETEF) require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and feasibility of ETEF in stable preterm infants.
  • To compare the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and feeding intolerance between ETEF and traditional slow feeding advancement.
  • To assess other potential benefits of ETEF, such as reduced sepsis and hospital stay.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
  • Included studies compared ETEF with slow enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
  • Analyzed data from four trials involving 393 VLBW infants (birth weight >1000-1200g).

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or feeding intolerance between ETEF and slow advancement groups.
  • ETEF was associated with a significantly lower risk of late-onset sepsis (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30-0.61).
  • Infants receiving ETEF experienced a shorter hospital stay by an average of 1.31 days.

Conclusions:

  • ETEF appears to be a safe and feasible feeding strategy for stable preterm infants within the specified birth weight range.
  • ETEF may offer benefits in reducing late-onset sepsis and length of hospital stay.
  • A large-scale randomized trial is recommended to confirm these findings and establish definitive clinical guidelines.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding01:26

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is appropriate for patients who cannot eat but still have a functioning digestive system. It is also beneficial for individuals with swallowing difficulties, anorexia, malabsorption, or those who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
1.3K
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding01:15

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding

Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
893
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.5K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups01:09

Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
5.8K